Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Apartheid in schools

The artilce below appeared in Monday's Irish Times.

And what does the Catholic Church have to say. How do the Jesuits, the Spiritans, the Dominicans - not the Sisters, who have been at the vanguard of education in Ireland - reply to this article?

Subtle form of apartheid permeates school system

ANALYSIS: The Department of Education's audit of school enrolment policies is a landmark document with huge implications for schools, writes Seán Flynn , Education Editor.

THE TWO-TIER nature of Irish education at second level is exposed in the Department of Education's audit. In many areas, provisions for the children of immigrants, those with special education needs and Travellers are largely confined to vocational and community schools.

There is a class divide permeating the Irish education system at second level.
In large provincial towns, better-off girls gravitate towards the convent school while boys enrol at the voluntary secondary school run by one of the religious orders.

The task of educating the childrenof immigrants or those with special learning needs is a job for other schools in the town.

The pattern is similar in Dublin, especially on the south side, where there is virtually no provision for special needs students in many "elite" schools.

But it is a very subtle form of apartheid. There are no signs outside any of these schools proclaiming "newcomers or special needs not welcome".

Instead, parents seeking enrolment will be told that the school has little experience in these areas; they might be better off in the local vocational and community schools.

There are other means of maintaining the status quo. Enrolment policies that favour past pupils and siblings can be used to exclude children of immigrants. The "first come, first served" approach of some schools can also work against them.

According to Minister for Education Mary Hanafin, some schools with few "newcomer" or special needs pupils could use this perception of elitism to recruit more pupils.

And parents cannot be absolved of blame. In a recent address, Archbishop of Dublin Dr Diarmuid Martin scolded parents - especially those in prosperous Dublin suburbs - who have scant interest in real diversity in schools.

So what can be done about the cherrypicking and discrimination?

At present the only recourse available to an unhappy parent whose child is refused entry to a school is Section 29 of the Education Act. But, as Ms Hanafin acknowledges, few parents are even aware of its existence - and some schools are in no hurry tp point parents in the right direction. Section 29 is slow, cumbersome and ineffective.

Ideally, the Minister would like schools in each area to adopt a common enrolment policy.

But in her letter to the various education partners, she acknowledges this is not always possible as various schools compete for pupils, at a time when school numbers are declining at second
level.

But the Minister is getting tougher. Regional officers will be asking schools to explain their enrolment procedures.

The Minister is also edging towards some form of new regulation in the area. This might include the appointment of a new admissions officer in each region who would enforce fair admission policies.

The Teachers' Union of Ireland, many of whose members work in vocational schools, wants sanctions against schools that refuse to shoulder their responsibilities.

Specifically, the TUI wants the Government to withhold State funding from any fee-paying school that cherrypicks some students and refuses to enrol others. (Curiously, fee-paying schools were not included in the audit).

To date, the Minister has been reluctant to take this kind of robust approach. Indeed, there is little discussion of any possible new sanctions in her letter to the education partners.

But it is clear that the political - and what one might call the moral - pressure on schools to act responsibly is being ratcheted up.

In all, 1,998 schools were audited (1,572 at primary and 426 at post-primary).

Broadly, the picture at primary level was more positive, although the scant number of special needs pupils and other minorities in the Galescoileann will raise questions.

The INTO said last night that it was clear that community superseded religion and other considerations at primary level.

"The local primary school appears to be the school of choice for the majority of parents. In turn, primary schools enrol children from their localities. This is one of the great strengths of the Irish primary education system and everyone in education should strive to maintain it," said INTO.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I don't see many solutions being offered by the Minister. The front page article had a sentence in it: "The study found that some schools were using elaborate pre-enrolment procedures, such as waiting lists, that could exclude some students."

Since when was a waiting list an "elaborate pre-enrolment procedure"? Educate Together schools operate on a strictly first come first served basis, i.e. a waiting list. Siblings don't even get to jump the queue. They take special needs kids and foreigners if they are on the waiting list. They see this as the fairest system, and yes, it does mean in a lot of cases that newcomers can't get in because they haven't been on the list since birth. It can lead to schools in high demand becoming overly homogenous and middle class, because only the people who are clued into how the system works have their kids' names down on the waiting list. But any other system can lead to favouritism and pull coming into play. What system are schools supposed to be using that will solve all these problems?

Michael Commane said...

Thank you Anne for your comment.

Michael Commane said...

A major criterium for gaining entrance to the so-called 'elite' post primary schools run by religious orders is the size of a young person's parents' bank balance.

Can some provinical out there explain how that ties in with the story of the Gospel?

This blogger has little information on 'Educate Together' schools, hence no critique or comment can be made.

But can the question be asked if they are exclusive to the children of middle class parents?

Your comment seems to answer that question.


Again, thank you.

Michael said...

My niece has Down's Syndrome and every effort made to get her a place in a secondary school has resulted in subtle refusals.

Schools are underfunded with the result that schools where the parents are better off can do significantly better than schools where parents are poorer: because the fundraising and direct contribution of the former are several times larger than the latter.

This is not just a matter for religious schools. What about schools under Church patronage at primary level? Why do we never hear of the inequality and injustice of the system which allows some to prevail? Why not establish a 'common pot' for all the schools in each diocese as the ONLY way that additional contributions can be made to a school and use diocesan policy to enforce it?

Michael said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Michael Commane said...

Re Michael's comment
A parish secretary was overheard saying that if her/his family was as badly managed as what he/she experiences in the running of a parish, then her/his family would not survive.

When people talk about church 'policy' they often overestimate levels of organisation, policy and thinking that go into daily hierarchical church life.

Far too often the chaos and disorder is hidden under ecclesiastical mumbo jumbo.

Featured Post

The world sure is in a state of chassis

Conor Cruise O’Brien was prescient when he coined the acronym GUBU when he referring to a political scandal in Ireland during a Haughey gove...