Saturday, May 31, 2025

Remembering German filmmaker Rainer Werner Fassbinder

German filmmaker, actor and dramatist Rainer Werner Fassbinder was  born on this day, May 31, 1945 in Bad Wörishofen in Bavaria.

He was a major figure of the New German Cinema movement. Fassbinder was critical of the post war German class system.

He was steeped in the turmoil of the results of Hitler’s war and nervous of Germany’s ‘Economic Miracle’.

Some of his extraordinary films include: The Marriage of Maria Braun, Lili Marleen and probably his masterpiece, Berlin Alexanderplatz.

He died of a drug overdose on June 19, 1982 at the  age of 37.

Rainer Werner Fassbinder was a genius, who made powerful, extraordinary films. 

Friday, May 30, 2025

Arrroyo’s sneering and Kelly’s cutlery

Below is video and comment

of Raymond Arroyo on his X page. Mr Arroyo works for EWTN. It is a US television station, which purports to be a Catholic media outlet. It is akin to Fox News. It is everything that has forced so many people feel alienated from the Catholic Church.

Arroyo’s obsequiousness towards Donald Trump and then his jeering of Emmanuel Macron is simply pathetic. What has it to do with the mission of the Catholic Church; sneering at people was never the message of Jesus Christ.

And then there is Michael Kelly’s social media posting about ‘A beautiful dinner tonight to mark the election of Pope Leo XIV’.

It seems the dinner took place some time after the pope’s inauguration. Maybe  the nonsense in it all is given away by the incorrect positioning of the cutlery.

Sycophancy gone wild.

It’s difficult to take this view of Christianity but it’s the ‘style’ that is in the ascendance these days and it is this movement that is attracting many priestly vocations.

Worrying times.

RaymondArroyo (@Raymond Arroyo) posted: “She mauled him like an aged bear!” My take on Brigitte Macron’s swipe at her husband and what it means- from this week’s ARROYO GRANDE. And don’t miss my interview with Tom Dreesen on the lessons Sinatra taught him. Subscribe and watch/ hear the full episode here:

📺 https://x.com/raymondarroyo/status/1928105131662528890?s=51&t=UgcVh3PPqPDgrCZ5Ux8O1Q

Thursday, May 29, 2025

Rees-Mogg confuses nominative and accusative case

How the mighty have fallen.

Jacob Rees-Mogg, who presents an evening programme on the GBNews every weekday evening, introduced his show on Tuesday saying: “It’s me,[sic] Jacob Rees-Mogg.


And that from the man who considers himself an expert in many areas, especially in the King’s English.

Or maybe it was he felt little point in getting grammar correct with GBNews viewers.

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

These Lidl boots ended up on the other foot

This week’s column in The Kerryman newspaper.

Michael Commane

Is it time we put computers in their place? It’s a question I asked myself over the last few days.


I returned a faulty pair of hiking boots to a Lidl store. There  was no problem changing them but because they were faulty I had to pay for the new pair and was told that the money would be refunded to my account between three and five working days. The boots cost €19.99 and were great value for money. 

Eight/10 years earlier I had bought a similar pair, that had served me well. I was waiting to replace them with a similar pair, so was delighted when I saw them on sale.


The delight was short lived.

It was two weeks before I realised the money had not been credited to my account.


The shop was not able to help and told me to contact Lidl via its WhatApp number. I think I contacted them via their website, gave all the necessary details, ticked every box and pressed the send button. Within minutes I received an automated reply thanking me. 


But again I was asked to perform the operation, giving them all the information. The following day I called Lidl HQ and eventually got speaking to a human voice. What a privilege that was in the wonderful era of our technological progress. The agent was most helpful, she had my report in front of her and after a few minutes’ conversation told me that Lidl personnel had inputted an incorrect date in my file. Instead of writing 17.04.2025, 17.04.2024 was typed. 


The agent assured me the error would be corrected and my account might even be credited that same day.


Guess what happens? The following day I receive an email from Lidl requesting that I give them details of my purchase.


A WhatsApp message from Lidl begins: ‘Hi(followed with an emoji) my name is LiA[sic], the digital Assistant! (another emoji), I have been trained to resolve the majority of our customer’s[sic] queries, so 

I hope I will be able to help you today.’ Such blather and all digitally generated.


I was at the end of my tether repeatedly filling out forms and reading pretend real human letters. I can’t help thinking we are being treated like morons. If I make a single mistake it invalidates the entire process and I have to start all over again. But in this case with Lidl it is they who have erred and all the time they have my money. I well know it is a pittance and why bother, indeed, it may not be a pittance for a homeless person. 


It’s that sense of powerlessness, sitting at a computer screen or the end of a phone line listening to a recorded voice. How often does the phone simply drop and you have to start all over again. Have you noticed how many websites don’t give a telephone number. It’s clear companies/organisations don’t want people calling them.


Imagine what it is going to be like as AI develops. Good luck to Pope Leo who has his sights on the world of Artificial Intelligence. In his first days he has spoken about its dangers. Lidl, listen.


The Lidl issue is not yet fully resolved. I’ll keep you informed.

Tuesday, May 27, 2025

President Donald Trump is a snatch-and-grab artist.

Maureen Dowd’s take on President Donald Trump in The Irish Times yesterday. If it were not all so scary it would be hilarious.

When Donald Trump was headed for the Republican nomination in the summer of 2016, I took Carl Hulse, our chief Washington correspondent, to Trump Tower to meet him.

Trump didn’t know anything about the inner workings of Washington. He proudly showed us his “Wall of Shame” with pictures of Republican candidates he had bested. His campaign office had few staffers, but it overflowed with cheesy portraits of him sent by fans: one of him playing poker with Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon and Teddy Roosevelt, and a cardboard cut-out of him giving a thumbs-up, flanked by Reagan and John Wayne.

As we were leaving, Hulse warned Trump drily, “If you ever get a call from our colleague Eric Lipton, you’ll know you’re in trouble.”

“Eric Lipton?” Trump murmured.

The president probably knows who Lipton is now, because the Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times investigative reporter is tracking Trump on issues of corruption as closely as the relentless lawman in the white straw hat tracked Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.

Lipton and the Times’s David Yaffe-Bellany were on the scene at Trump’s Virginia golf club on Thursday night as the president held his gala dinner to promote sales of $TRUMP, the meme coin he launched on the cusp of his inauguration. (Melania Trump debuted hers two days later.)

Trump has been hawking himself in an absurdly grandiose way his whole life. But this time, he isn’t grandstanding as a flamboyant New York business-person. He’s selling himself as the president of the United States, staining his office with a blithe display of turpitude.

Protesters at the golf club shouted, “Shame, shame, shame,” but there is no shame in Trumpworld. Trump asked guests, who were whooping with joy at the president who allowed them to purchase such primo access by essentially lining the pockets of Trump and his family, if they had seen his helicopter.

“Yeah, super cool,” gushed a guest.

Buyers flew in from China and around the world, scarfing up a fortune in $TRUMP – some had millions of dollars worth – to procure the 220 seats at the dinner.

“It was a spectacle that could only have happened in the era of Donald J Trump,” Lipton and Yaffe-Bellany wrote. “Several of the dinner guests, in interviews with the Times, said that they attended the event with the explicit intent of influencing Trump and US financial regulations.”

Pan-seared influence peddling with a citrus reduction. The prez is a pro at quid pro quo.

Trump’s press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, rebutted criticism on Thursday, saying, “The president is attending it in his personal time. It is not a White House dinner.”

But he flew to Virginia on Marine One. He gave his remarks from a lectern with the presidential seal. And some of the crypto crowd got a tour of the White House on Friday (Lipton took his post outside the fence).

With more than a dozen lucrative deals for his family and partners, the Times article said, “Mr Trump is estimated to have added billions to his personal fortune, at least on paper, since the start of his new term, much of it through crypto.”

The corruption is seeping across the Potomac.

Donald Trump jnr and investors are opening a pricey private club in Georgetown called Executive Branch, where business and tech moguls can cosy up to administration big shots.

The notorious $400 million (€351 million) gift for the president from the Qataris, a luxury jumbo jet, has arrived in San Antonio. This alluring “pre-bribe”, as Saturday Night Live dubbed it, instantly wiped out Trump’s old concerns that “the nation of Qatar, unfortunately, has historically been a funder of terrorism at a very high level”. (Accepting the plane was sort of like a terrorist fist-bump, the same kind a Fox News host bizarrely accused the Obamas of making with each other.)

Other foreign leaders got the message that emoluments were welcome. In an Oval Office meeting where Trump continued to relish his role as protector of the white patriarchy, the South African president jokingly told the American president, “I’m sorry I don’t have a plane to give you.” (This might be the line that best sums up the Trump presidency in the history books.)

Trump replied breezily, “I wish you did. I’d take it.”

Trump Inc’s money grabs were taking place against the background of the president pushing through his “big, beautiful Bill” extending his obscene tax cut for the rich while slicing billions from programmes that help poor people stay alive.

“The guy promised to make American families more prosperous,” Barack Obama’s former chief strategist David Axelrod said. “He just decided to start with his own.”

In a galaxy long ago and far away, there was shame attached to selling your office. Sherman Adams, president Dwight Eisenhower’s chief of staff, lost his job and ruined his reputation after he accepted a vicuña coat from a Boston textile manufacturer doing business with the federal government.

Trump has no reputable reputation to ruin. He’s a snatch-and-grab artist.

“I think social media and Donald Trump’s persona have numbed people to the idea that certain forms of behaviour are off-limits,” said Tim O’Brien, a Trump biographer. “No institution has been able to rein in Donald Trump. He got impeached twice. Didn’t matter, so Congress couldn’t rein him in. He had all sorts of federal and state prosecutions that ended up going nowhere, so law enforcement couldn’t rein him in. The media has been covering him as close as anyone could ever be covered, and the media couldn’t rein him in. I think it makes people just sort of turn away and accept it as inevitable.”

Before he did his YMCA dance and scrammed early, the scamming Trump told the crypto enthusiasts at his golf club that he wasn’t pushing crypto and bitcoin for himself.

“I really do it because I think it’s the right thing to do,” he said.

In Trump’s moral universe, the right thing to do is always the thing that makes him richer. – New York Times

Monday, May 26, 2025

“If we don’t speak up it’s going to get worse"

Columnist Fintan O’Toole in The Irish Times last Tuesday

Democracies don’t turn into autocracies easily or overnight. There has to be a critical mass of true believers – but more important is the critical mass of appeasers. These are the people and institutions who imagine that if they capitulate early they will avoid the worst of it. They cede their own power in the deluded hope that, if they don’t fight back, the bullies will leave them alone. And, if they are intellectuals, they smother their humiliation in upbeat, high-flown language.

A case in point is one of the world’s great universities, Columbia in New York. It is an American institution, but also a global one: nearly 14,000 international students and more than 3,000 faculty members and researchers at Columbia depend on US government-issued visas and green cards. It also runs joint academic programmes with European universities – among them Trinity College Dublin.

Which makes it a hugely important test case. If a rich and famous institution doesn’t stand up for itself, what chance have millions of ordinary people or vulnerable communities with few resources?

I’ve been looking at the internal messages Columbia’s leadership has sent to its staff in recent months to explain – or, more accurately, explain away – its attempts to appease the Trump administration. They exemplify the deterioration of language that is the inevitable side effect of servility.Bringing American universities to heel is an important part of Trump’s authoritarian agenda. They are centres of independent thought and producers of evidence-based research, neither of which is compatible with the imperial presidency he is creating. In addition, Columbia was in Trump’s sights because it has been one of the largest centres of protest against Israel’s mass killing in Gaza.

This has provided the very thin semblance of justification for taking over the universities – it is being done, allegedly, to protect students from anti-Semitism. As Simon Schama put it in The Financial Times: “Coming to the aid of campus Jews was always a pretext. Forgive us if we doubt that presenting the subjection of higher education’s independence to an ideological purge, labelled ‘defence of the Jews’, will work as an antidote to anti-Semitism.”

On March 7th, the Trump administration announced that it was withholding $400 million of federal grants to Columbia while warning that this was the “first round of action”. Instead of making clear that it would defend its independence, Columbia responded by saying it “pledged to work with the federal government to restore the funding”.

The administration then demanded that Columbia concede on the most important principle of any university – academic freedom – before it would even negotiate on the funds. And the university capitulated. It agreed to “expand intellectual diversity” – code for hiring more Trump-friendly faculty – while “reinforcing the University’s commitment to excellence and fairness in Middle East studies”.

It would also hire a new senior vice provost (implicitly one acceptable to Trump) to “review” the university’s “Center for Palestine Studies; the Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies; Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies; the Middle East Institute; the Tel Aviv and Amman global hubs; the School of International and Public Affairs Middle East Policy major; and other University programs focused on the Middle East”.

Snakeskin of emollient evasion

This is bad enough. Worse, though, is the way it was presented to the Columbia faculty wrapped in a snakeskin of emollient evasion. The university’s president said that, “both within and beyond our campuses, we need to understand the sources of discontent with Columbia and identify what we can do to rebuild credibility and confidence with different stakeholders”.

In this Orwellian language, the inevitably messy life of an institution committed to intellectual freedom becomes “sources of discontent”. An authoritarian government becomes a “stakeholder” with whom the supposed upholders of that freedom have to “rebuild credibility”.

And once you start down this road, it’s all good news. Instead of saying “we have, under duress, appointed a new vice provost to comply with the Trump administration’s demands to supervise our Middle East-related programmes”, Columbia management announced that the person in question had been appointed to “focus on cross-school academic excellence” – adding, as though it were an afterthought, “starting with a comprehensive review of Regional Studies programs. This work will begin with a faculty committee review of Middle East programs”.

And then on April 16th, in a cheery email beginning with “Happy Weekend!” the faculty was told that the university had established a special portal in which they could “share with leadership as they navigate the challenges of the moment”. The kicker is that “the portal is totally anonymous”.

In other words, one of the major universities in what used to be called the free world has had to establish a forum in which its teachers can express themselves anonymously for fear of consequences if they do so publicly. This, of course, reinforces the message already sent by the Trump administration’s arrests of students Mahmoud Khalil and Mohsen Mahdawi who protested against the killing in Gaza: if tenured faculty members have to resort to anonymity, wouldn’t it be wise for students – especially those on visas – to just shut up?

This is what happens when institutions decide to “work with” incipient dictatorships. They internalise servility, reimagining humiliations as exciting opportunities. They slide from reassuring themselves that they are merely making a few compromises for the greater good to presenting the abandonment of fundamental principles as excellent news.

And, of course, it’s all futile. One of the heroes of this moment is Michael Roth, president of Wesleyan university. He had described himself as “a little neurotic Jewish kid from Long Island – afraid of everything”. But he has had the courage to say: “If we don’t speak up, it’s going to get worse. Much worse, much faster . . . [Appeasement] doesn’t work, because the other side just keeps wanting more and more power.”

Saturday, May 24, 2025

A fabulous story about a loyal dog

A fabulous story. Frank McNally’s An Irishman’s Diary in The Irish Times on Wednesday.

An agricultural scientist at Tokyo’s Imperial University, Hidesabur  Ueno (1872–1925) might have been quickly forgotten after his death, from a cerebral haemorrhage during a lecture, 100 years ago this week.

But his dog could not forget him and, thanks to the dog, neither could Japan. A purebred akita, the animal had been in the habit of accompanying his master to Shibuya railway station every morning, then greeting him there on his return each evening.

And after the professor’s sudden death, the habit continued. Hachik , as the dog was known (from Hachi, meaning the number eight, and -k , meaning “little”) was first farmed out to foster carers.

But when he returned to Shibuya, to be minded by Ueno’s former gardener, the dog resumed his evening vigils at the station, scanning the alighting passengers for a face that would never return.

At first, he was considered a pest, ill-treated by station vendors and children. Then in 1932, a Japanese daily newspaper romanticised the dog’s vigil and turned him into a cult.

Even while Hachik  still lived, admirers erected a statue of him, while donations of food poured in.

By the time of his death in 1935, the dog might have been a martyr to yakitori chicken. A postmortem later found the remains of several wooden skewers in his stomach, although it turned out those hadn’t killed him.

His funeral made international headlines. A Reuters report carried in The Irish Times said he had been buried in Tokyo “by sixteen priests, according to the rites of Buddhism, and mourned by the whole nation”.

Promoted as a symbol of devotion and other prized virtues, the dead Hachik  was a nationalist hero, his story featuring in schoolbooks.

In what sounds like a cautionary metaphor, the bronze statue was later melted down for munitions during the second World War. But the cult survived. In 1948, a new statue took the place of the old one. It went on to be a Tokyo version of Clerys clock: a meeting place for generations of Japanese.

Among the other things, Shibuya is known for today is a celebrity road junction. During the Rugby World Cup in 2019, I caught the metro there to partake in one of the city’s rites of passage: the mass, six-way pedestrian crossing, triggered by the appearance of the little green man.

Up to 3,000 people cross the junction simultaneously, many pausing to take iPhone pictures of themselves and each other. The bronze Hachik  looks on, unmoved.

His is probably the most famous (and one of the better documented) examples of a universal legend: the faithful dog pining forever for a dead master.

More typically, the dog keeps a vigil at the owner’s grave: as in the tale of Greyfriars Bobby, a Scottish legend whose popularity almost rivals the Lough Ness monster and may be about equally factual.

A Skye terrier, Bobby, is said to have guarded his master’s grave in Edinburgh for 14 years until his own death in 1872. But the historicity of the story is something of a grey area – or even a Gray one, since two different John Grays, a farmer and a nightwatchman – have been advanced as the dog’s owner.

There may have been more than one Bobby too. It has been suggested that when the first one died, having become a tourist attraction, canny local traders found it imperative to replace him.

Even the dog’s pedigree has been questioned. He could have been a Dandie Dinmont, a popular breed at the time, but perhaps not as easily romanticised as a Skye.

A better-documented case in Europe was Fido (the popular dog name derives from the Latin for “faithful”), whose story made headlines in Italy in the 1940s and 50s.

Of uncertain breeding, he was found injured on a street one day in 1941 and nursed back to health by a local factory worker.

Like Hachik , he then developed the habit of accompanying his master on the commute every morning and greeting him at the bus stop in the evening.

Then in 1943, the owner died during an Allied bombing. Thereafter, until the dog’s own death in 1958, Fido kept the daily bus stop vigil in vain, garnering several Italian magazine articles in the process, and a 1957 mention in Time. He too earned a statue while still alive. He also enjoyed the affections of the townspeople of Luco, including a butcher who fed him and the bus company which let him wait indoors in cold weather.

The owner’s impoverished widow, however, had to keep renewing his licence every year, at least until 1957, when as Time reported:

“Last week, despite the desperate straits of his own treasury, the mayor of Luco himself decreed that Fido should henceforth live tax-free as the only legally unlicensed dog in Italy. ‘He has set an example of fidelity to our village,’ said his honor, ‘and deserves to be placed on the list of Luco’s honored citizens’.”

It was a populist move, but also a cost-efficient one. Tax-free Fido died a year later, of old age.

Friday, May 23, 2025

What must the farmer think of religious social media?

These days in Ireland are proving a godsend for farmers; hay is a month early, silage too. The strawberries are said to be the best in over 50 years.

Talking and observing farmers at work during these glorious summer days and then reading the religious comments on X and Facebook one can’t help but think what the social media authors are writing is a parallel world to the world of the farmer, indeed, the work of most people inhabit.

The holy/religous material on social media sounds and looks like a giant bubble waiting to be burst. Everything about it seems to be about nothing.

During the election of the pope or immediately after it Bishop Robert Barron said that he hopes the next papacy will be a quiet one. Think of it, these words from a man who never shuts up, who seems to tour the world with great speed.

I was looking at a farmer driving his tractor today pulling a trailer packed with bales of silage and wondering how in heaven’s name could any of the so-called religious stuff on social media mean anything to him. So much of it is about nothing, other than one ego outdoing another. Or maybe looking for money for a meaningless project.

Thursday, May 22, 2025

Former Israeli prime minister Olmert criticises Netanyahu

In a radio interview yesterday former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert was extremely critical of his country’s tactics in Gaza. 

The interviewer asked him how he felt about current prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s criticism of how he had spoken about the behaviour of the Israeli Defence Forces. 

Olmert replied pointing out that Netanyahu’s son is currently studying in the United Sates and far away from fighting IDF soldiers in Gaza.

It was a riveting interview. 

Wednesday, May 21, 2025

Friendship is a prized gift, something never earned

This week’s column in The Kerryman newspaper.

Michael Commane

We have had a great stretch of fabulous weather. A West Kerry farmer tells me he has his hay in a month earlier than last year. It’s been a time for the outdoors.


Perfect weather for the bicycle. On one of my cycles I called to someone I know over 30 years. We don’t meet that often but anytime we do I am in awe of her kindness and generosity of spirit. There’s always a great rapport between us. She is in her mid-70s.


We chatted over a cup of tea and a slice or two of homemade brown bread. I’m still thinking of the hour or so we sat talking and laughing. She has that gift of making time stop, and you are all that matters at that moment.


Earlier in the year during lunch in one of our Dominican priories I said that I thought such-and -such a person was great. Someone at table asked me what made someone great in my eyes. For a moment I was stuck and then, half flippantly said that if I thought they liked me then I considered them great. There was a momentary silence at the table. Maybe people were surprised with my reply. I can still remember one man smiling before saying: ‘that’s a new one on me’.


What is it that attracts us to people? There is the whole world of sexuality that plays a large and significant role in how we team up. You would want to be a sublime liar or a total fool to deny the significance and indeed power of sexual attraction. But even with that there is always more to what makes people drawn to one another.


Can you imagine being friendly with someone whom you know does not like you? And then, the smallest of incidences can set a friendship on fire or destroy it dead.


Ever since I heard astrophysicist Dame Jocelyn Bell Burnell tell Tommy Tiernan that there are one hundred thousand million galaxies I’m inclined to look at all reality, at least the reality that is in front of my eyes with a grain of salt. And yet, I greatly cherish my friendships. I’d be lost without those who are close to me. But why do I like X and don’t like Y? Why does X or Y like me? 


Surely in so many ways it’s a lottery, then again can’t you say the same about the totality of our lives. Or can you?


Every friendship is different, there is a uniqueness about friendship. But it can also make or break us. It must be close to hell to live in a broken marriage, where there is nothing left between the partners. Living in community too can be tumultuous.


No doubt all friendships require work. Like everything in life, there has to be give and take. But it’s the accidental element about it that is fascinating. 


I remember learning in theology that all being is accidental, except God. It’s what distinguishes God from the rest of creation.


Wise words from Dominican saint, Thomas Aquinas make great sense: 'There is nothing on this earth more to be prized than true friendship’.


Tuesday, May 20, 2025

Immorality is the result of ignorance - Socrates

Joe Humphreys in The Irish Times yesterday.

Poor Donald Trump. Just a week ago, he declared only “a stupid person” would turn down a $400 million luxury plane presented to him as a personal gift by Qatari royals. But it seems like he is the stupid one twice over.

Forbes has reported that Qatar’s rulers had put the plane on the market in 2020 but failed to find a buyer, suggesting they decided to offload the 747 on the US president to save them “a big chunk of change on maintenance and storage costs”, given “the fading demand for these huge, fuel-guzzling, highly personalised aeroplanes”.

It turns out you should look a gift horse in the mouth. Charlie Haughey could vouch for that. Flattered by the attentions of a wealthy international art dealer in 1989, the then taoiseach accepted his donation to the State of seven pedigree Arabian horses which, when they arrived on Irish soil, were found to be “of a very poor standard”. Declassified State papers revealed the taxpayer was left with a hefty bill for transport and stables for the millionaire’s nags.

The lesson for puffed-up leaders is to, literally or figuratively, kick the tyres of any jets that the superrich try to offload on you before you say yes.

But Trump has revealed his stupidity in a deeper and more profound sense by trousering an expensive bounty in a blatantly unethical manner. To understand why, we need to go back to Socrates and his principle that no one does wrong voluntarily. Immorality is the result of ignorance.

Too often in public debate an assumption is made that wrongdoers are acting with malice. Dig a bit deeper, however, and one usually finds a perverse logic – a stupidity, in other words – that motivates the offender’s actions.

There is a strong flavour of Socratic thinking in Christianity. “Father, forgive them, they know not what they do,” said Jesus as he was being crucified. Before condemning anyone for moral transgressions they should be pitied, or at least understood. Pope Francis reiterated the point, describing selfishness as “a form of self-harm . . . Selfishness is stupid”.

Theory of stupidity

The Lutheran pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer developed this idea into a general theory of stupidity. Writing from a German prison, after being arrested by the Nazis for plotting against Adolf Hitler, he declared: “Stupidity is a more dangerous enemy of the good than malice. One may protest against evil; it can be exposed and, if need be, prevented by use of force. Evil always carries within itself the germ of its own subversion in that it leaves behind in human beings at least a sense of unease. Against stupidity we are defenceless”.

Trump is no Hitler. But he is tearing up international law. Using political office to personally enrich himself is part of that. So too is his style of using war for commercial opportunities – whether it’s accessing rare minerals in Ukraine or licensing private firms to provide food in Gaza. (Sure, you’d be “stupid” not to take your cut.)

Late-stage capitalism

Before we get too judgmental, however, Trump is acting in ways familiar to any citizen in late-stage capitalism. He is what Keynesians would call the “rational economic actor” writ large.

According to “rational choice theory” in economics, individuals will try maximise their advantage – and to minimise their losses – in any situation.

Trump can break rules against accepting personal gifts as US president because there is only an upside. He doesn’t have to worry about losses since he has already dismantled official systems of accountability. The rest of us don’t have that power. If you don’t pay your taxes, there’s a good chance Revenue will come after you and penalties await.

Looked at this way, it’s not moral superiority that makes us play by the rules while oligarchs cheat. Rather it is economic rationality. So before condemning Trump, it is worth considering whether you have your own price? Would you break a moral code if it was “rational” on a cost-benefit basis?

Under today’s crony capitalism, Trump represents a pure form of economic rationality. He also epitomises stupidity in Socrates’s understanding of the word. No one would intentionally harm themselves, the Greek philosopher said. But, through ignorance, the greedy and vain man destroys his own character.

Writing as fascism marched across Europe, Bonhoeffer realised that rationality – or what passed for it in civilised society – was itself the problem since millions of Germans saw Hitler as the logical answer to their problems. Against tyranny, he asked: “Who stands firm?” His answer: “Only the one whose ultimate standard is not his reason.”

It is the person who is “prepared to sacrifice all” for higher principles – specifically, for Bonhoeffer, Christian faith.

Bonhoeffer turned down opportunities to escape Nazi Germany. Was that stupid of him?

He didn’t think so: “The ultimate question for a responsible man to ask is not how he is to extricate himself heroically from the affair, but how the coming generation is to live. It is only from this question, with its responsibility towards history, that fruitful solutions can come, even if for the time being they are very humiliating.”

A few months after writing those words, Bonhoeffer was arrested. On April 9th, 1945, he was stripped naked and executed with five other prisoners at Flossenbürg concentration camp. He was aged 39.


Monday, May 19, 2025

Pope Francis’ inspiring words on hope

Hope isn’t about ignoring reality or pretending everything is perfect.
It’s the quiet courage to believe that even in the darkest moments, a new tomorrow is possible.

"The future does have a name, and its name is Hope. 

Feeling hopeful does not mean being optimistically naive. Hope is the virtue of a heart that doesn't lock itself into darkness, that doesn't dwell on the past, that does not simply get by in the present, but is able to see a tomorrow. 

Hope is the door that opens onto the future. Hope is a humble, hidden seed of life that, with time, will develop into a large tree. 

And it can do so much, because a tiny flicker of light that feeds on hope is enough to shatter the shield of darkness. 

A single individual is enough for hope to exist — and that individual can be you." 

Sunday, May 18, 2025

Raymond Arroyo’s X comment disrespectful to Pope Francis

EWTN columnist Raymond Arroyo posts today on X:

“He’s [Pope Leo] certainly not Francis II. Viva il Papa."

Anyone who watches EWTN knows where it stands when it comes to its views on church and world.

Sometimes it tries to conceal its far right ideology and its links with the current US administration. 

Mr Arroyo lets the veil fall with his X comment.

While it is unfortunate, it gives one some sense of his views and opinions and those of EWTN.

In the first days of Leo’s papacy Arroyo’s comment is most unhelpful

In his homily today Pope Leo said that it is never a matter of feeling superior to the world. 

Such a sentiment needs to be shouted from the rooftops.


Pope Leo XIV and the mini skirt

Fr Robert Prevost's homilies were unusually direct. “He’d say that a homily should be short and to the point, like a miniskirt,” said Elsa Ocampo, 81, a volunteer at the Our Lady of Montserrat church in Trujillo.

Saturday, May 17, 2025

States and organisation dismiss criticism at their peril

KatJa Hoyer’s Beyond the Wall is a masterclass in explaining East Germany from 1949 to 1990.

Hoyer was born in Guben in East Germany, her mother was a teacher and her father an officer in the NVA - East German Army.

She is a columnist for the Washington Post and hosts with Oliver Moody the podcast The New Germany.

The book gives a great insight into many aspects of life in the GDR about we in the west were never aware.

One of Hoyer’s major observations is that if any state or organisation, any grouping does not listen to criticism it is doomed.

Featured Post

Make sure to check carefully all your service bills

This week’s column in The Kerryman newspaper. Michael Commane Regular readers of this column may remember I wrote some weeks back about my t...