Tuesday, April 15, 2025

If the hat fits wear it - this one is a perfect fit

This week’s column in The Kerryman newspaper.

Michael Commane

Have you ever done anything on the spur of the moment and then regretted it? Or have there been times when you kicked yourself for not acting in a spontaneous manner?


Is the world divided into two classes; those who are cautious and those who are spontaneous?


Jefferson Smurfit has had a long history in paper manufacturing and corrugated packaging in Ireland. The company had a paper mill in Dublin’s Clonskeagh, which closed in 2009. The factory had been in production since 1952. 


When my father retired in 1974 at age 65 Smurfit offered him a job. He worked at the paper mill in Clonskeagh for the next 18 years, retiring for the second time in 1992 at 82. He enjoyed every day at the mill. He loved his work and colleagues, and in turn Smurfit and staff had great respect for him.


Last September Smurfit and US Westrock merged to create one of the world's largest paper and packaging producers in the world. The company is headquartered in Dublin’s Clonskeagh.


Smurfit Westrock, has a presence in 40 countries around the world, operates 62 paper mills and has 500 paper/cardboard packaging facilities.


Waiting for a train a few days ago I spotted a young man wearing a baseball cap with Smurfit Westrock emblazoned on it with the sigma symbol, which is the original Smurfit logo.


It was my first time to see the new baseball cap and for a few mili-seconds was tempted to grab it and run. How I would love to have had it. But of course I didn’t, nor would I have. But I did think it.

I was immediately reminded of my father.  


That particular day I was on trains for six hours and often thought about the cap. Silly I suppose, but that’s who I am. I got caught up in the day’s activities but kept thinking of the cap.


The next day I googled the Smurfit Westrock website. 


Found a phone number and called. Feeling embarrassed and somewhat stupid I explained my story to the receptionist, telling her my father worked with them, retiring at 82 and how I’d love one of their baseball caps. 


To my total surprise, she asked me my details and the following day two of the baseball caps were delivered by courier to my hall door.


The only reason my father retired at 82 was because he fell and broke his leg. Smurfit were wonderful employers and I know firsthand how my father enjoyed working with them. It kept him so fresh and alive. He was swimming in the sea at 92 and died at 95.


It makes no sense to have mandatory retirement on age grounds.


Pope John XXIII’s wise words applied to my mother and father, and I imagine to most of our parents: ‘Men are like wine - some turn to vinegar, but the best improve with age’.


The Smurfit Westrock gesture was one of simple kindness but just think of the PR value of it. Any time I’ll hear or see of Smurfit Westrock I’ll think positively. That’s life. And a special thank you to the receptionist who took my call.


Monday, April 14, 2025

Palm Sunday was a protest not a procession

This is written by Episcopalian priest Andrew Thayer, rector at Trinity Church, New Orleans. It was published in The New York Times.


On Sunday, in cities around the world, Christians begin Holy Week by celebrating Palm Sunday, when Jesus entered Jerusalem for the final time before his death and resurrection. To mark the day, Christians recreate Jesus’ procession, often starting outside churches and winding down sidewalks and city streets waving palm branches.


Celebrations like this often miss an uncomfortable truth about Jesus’ procession: At the time, it was a deliberate act of theological and political confrontation. It wasn’t just pageantry; it was protest.

On that first Palm Sunday, there was another procession entering Jerusalem. From the west came Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor, riding a warhorse and flanked by armed soldiers bedecked in the full pageantry of an oppressive empire. Every year during Passover, a Jewish festival celebrating liberation from Egyptian oppression and slavery, Pilate entered Jerusalem to suppress any unrest set off by that memory.


His arrival wasn’t ceremonial; it was tactical — a calculated show of force, what the Pentagon might now call “shock and awe.” It displayed not only Rome’s power but also Rome’s theology. Caesar was not just the emperor; he was deified and called “Son of a God” on coins and inscriptions. His rule was absolute, and the peace it promised came through coercion, domination and the threat of violence.

 

From the opposite direction, both literally and figuratively, came Jesus’ procession.

Jesus entered the city not on a warhorse but on a donkey, not with battalions but with beggars. His followers were peasants, fishermen, women and children — people without standing or status. They waved palm branches — symbols of Jewish resistance to occupation since the Maccabean revolt — and cried out “Hosanna!” which means “Save us.” Save us from a system of oppression disguised as order. Save us from those who tacitly endorse greed with pious language and prayers.


Jesus’ procession should be seen as a parody of imperial power: a deliberate mockery of Roman spectacle and a prophetic enactment of a kingdom not built on violence but on justice.

The next day, Jesus walked into the Temple, the heart of Jerusalem’s religious and economic life, and flipped the tables in the marketplace, which he described as “a den of robbers.” The Temple wasn’t just a house of prayer. It was a financial engine, operated by complicit leaders under the constraints and demands of the occupying empire. Jesus shuts it down. This is what gets him killed.

Jesus wasn’t killed for preaching love, or healing the sick, or discussing theology routinely debated in the Temple’s courtyards, or blasphemy (the punishment for which was stoning). Rome didn’t crucify philosophers or miracle workers. Rome crucified insurrectionists. The sign nailed above his head — “King of the Jews” — was a political indictment and public warning. Like with the killing of the prophets before him, the message sent with Jesus’s death was that those who demand justice will inevitably find themselves crushed.

 

Sound familiar?

We, too, live in the shadow of empire. Ours doesn’t speak Latin or wear togas, but its logic is familiar. Our economy prioritizes the 1 percent and puts corporate profits over worker dignity. Our laws enforce inequality in the criminal justice system, education and health care. Our military-industrial complex would be the envy of Rome. We extract, exploit, incarcerate, and we call it “law and order.”

And just like in Jesus’ day, political leaders defend this arrangement while religious leaders bless it. As the French writer Frédéric Bastiat warned, “When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.” That was true in first-century Jerusalem. It remains true today.


Since the 1980s, movements like the Moral Majority and the Christian Coalition, and more recently, the New Apostolic Reformation, have not challenged the empire but rather sought to commandeer it. The Seven Mountain Mandate urges Christians to seize control of key sectors of society, including government, business, education and media. This is not a movement seeking to interrogate or challenge the injustice of empire. Quite the opposite. It is an ideology — a hunger for power and dominion — cloaked in pious language and baptized in the logic of empire. This is Christian nationalism in a nutshell.

Remember, Rome did not begin as an empire; it began as a republic. But over time, it ceded power to the few, tolerating cruelty, corruption and the consolidation of control, so long as it came wrapped in the promise of peace and prosperity. The emperor became both ruler and redeemer, venerated not for moral clarity but for the illusion of restored national greatness.

 

The false promise offered to both Romans and the people they conquered was that Caesar was divine — a chosen one, a lord. Today, Donald Trump is often cast in eerily similar terms by Christian nationalists: not as a moral leader, but as a figure who will deliver prosperity, protection, and cultural dominance, at least for a select few. To defy him, in this worldview, is not just to reject a man, but to reject a kind of sacred order. That impulse is not new. It is as old as Pilate’s procession.


But Jesus never sought to replace Caesar with a Christian Caesar. He came to dismantle the very logic of Caesar: the belief that might makes right, peace comes through violence and politics is best wielded through fear, coercion and control. Instead, he inaugurated a counter-kingdom that aspires to loving kindness, radical welcome, mercy and justice — a kingdom where the vulnerable and the poor are lifted up, and the idols of empire are exposed as frauds.


Waving palms on Palm Sunday connects us to justice, public life, discourse and action. We cannot remain silent on behalf of those who genuinely cry out “Hosanna … Save us.” At some point, we have to make a choice about the Jesus we claim to follow. Either he didn’t care about the poor, the marginalized and the oppressed — in which case we’ve built our religion on a hollow figure. Or he did care, deeply, and we’ve chosen to ignore that part because it challenges our comfort, our politics and our priorities.


Scripture’s power isn’t in magic or miracle, but in its witness, of people who loved boldly, acted justly, spoke truth to power, resisted empire and hoped defiantly in the face of despair. It is deeply relevant to modern life. The Resurrection, which Christians celebrate one week from Sunday, is not the reversal of Christ’s crucifixion. It is its vindication. It declares that even when the empire kills truth, truth still rises. That even when justice is crucified, it does not stay buried. The Caesars among us don’t get the final word.

Sunday, April 13, 2025

Respecting each other in friendship

"I hold this to be the highest task for a bond between two people: that each protects the solitude of the other."

Rainer Maria Rilke (German writer, born in Prague 1875, died 1926 in Switzerland)

Saturday, April 12, 2025

Donald Trump please don’t mess with Xi Jinping

President Donald Trump should check the words of Mao Zedong in 1953 when China was at war with the US.

“As to how long this war will last, we are not the ones who can decide. It used to depend on President Truman, and it will depend on President Eisenhower, or whoever becomes the next US president. It’s up to them. 

No matter how long this war is going to last we will never yield. We’ll fight until we completely triumph.”

Friday, April 11, 2025

Maga Chinese baseball hats get more expensive

The Maga baseball caps are made in China. They have now gone from $50 to $75.

If it were not so dangerous and vile it would all be hilarious.

President Trump never ceases to use crude and vulgar language. Yesterday he was on about foreign leaders kissing part of his anatomy.

At the Munich conference his vice president gave the Europeans a lecture about losing their moral compass.

It’s beyond belief.

What’s the United States democratic system doing about it all?

Thursday, April 10, 2025

How exactly did our Catholic schools teach Christianity?

There is much conversation about the state of faith in Ireland. There are those who believe that there is no place for faith in the country, no place for religion, priests are easy targets. Ireland is a cold place for  God. 

In recent days a priest visiting an elderly woman read eight lines from a Psalm. When he was finished the woman asked the priest if he were a Catholic. Her reasoning was that a Catholic priest would not read a Psalm to her.

A good example of how the faith has been taught/‘preached’ in the country. The following is a remark made on X by a Catholic commentator:  "Overheard in a cafe in Dublin: a lady, with great authority and indignation, explains to a friend the 'disgrace' she feels it is that children must be christened in order to make their First Holy Communion! Secular Ireland is a very curious place.”

What went on in all those schools that shouted from the rooftops about their 'Christian ethos’?

Might a great percentage of the fault lie with the priestly caste?


And how could a casual observance decide about the 'great authority and indignation' of a person? Glib and superficial.


Isn't it yet another example of how judgemental the Catholic apparatchik class have been and still can be in Ireland.


Wednesday, April 9, 2025

80 years ago the Germans hanged Dietrich Bonhoeffer

German theologian and anti-Hitler protestor Dietrich Bonhoeffer was hanged from a meathook on this day, April 9, 1945 in Flossenbürg concentration camp in Bavaria, just days before the Red Army liberated Berlin. He was 39 years of age.

Before being moved to Flossenburg he had been interned in Tegel in Berlin and then moved to Buchenwald near Weimar, where he was from February 7 until March 3, 1945.

A statue in honour of the man was unveiled in Weimar today. Weimar is some short few kilometres from Buchenwald.

The Catholic Church’s new deal with China

Below is Denis Staunton’s feature piece in The Irish Times on Saturday. Denis is based in China and is The Irish Times correspondent in the country.

Oops, Denis is confused about the thurible, but unlikely a thurible, or for that matter, a thurifer is terribly significant for the 10 million Catholics in the People’s Republic of China. Then again, the thurible is finding a whole new life with modern zealot-style priests.

No mention in the article about the role Archbishop Pietro Parolin has played in the new deal. Staunton does not even mention his name.

Denis Staunton
The Vatican has renewed an agreement with Chinese authorities aimed at ending division between two Catholic communities in the country but the deal has drawn criticism from some believers

The archbishop processed up the aisle behind a group of priests, deacons and altar servers, one of them swinging a thurifer as it pumped out thick gusts of incense. Behind them, a great organ thundered from the loft, as one of the cathedral’s ten choirs led the congregation in an introductory hymn.

This was high Mass at Beijing’s North Cathedral, a late 19th-century church near the city’s financial district built in the French Gothic style in the shape of a cross with an elaborate grey marble facade. There are holy water stoups inside each entrance, stations of the cross on the pillars lining the nave, votive statues in alcoves and side altars, and confessionals and a baptismal font at the back of the church.

The church sits in a large compound and the courtyard outside features two gold-roofed pavilions and other Chinese architectural features including 60 carved lions. The stained glass windows show scenes from the history of the Catholic Church in China and one of the most popular shrines inside features a Chinese Madonna and child.

“It’s a combination of the West and the East, the Catholic Church and the Chinese culture,” said Fr Simon Zhu, who has been a priest at the cathedral since 2014.

“We feel very blessed to have such a design. Even 100 years ago, the missionaries already started inculturation or Sinicization, the combination of Catholic culture and Chinese culture, Catholic thinking, plus Chinese thinking, and combining the two together.”

The principle of inculturation, adapting Christian teachings to local cultures, has a long tradition in the Catholic Church and the Jesuit Matteo Ricci blended Catholic faith with Chinese thinking in the 17th century. But the word Sinicization also refers to president Xi Jinping’s policy that “religions in China must be Chinese in orientation”, incorporated into socialist society and independent of foreign influence.

The archbishop of Beijing, Joseph Li Shan, is also the president of the Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association (CCPA), the representative body for Catholics officially recognised by the Chinese Communist Party. Most of China’s roughly 10 million Catholics attend officially sanctioned churches like the North Cathedral but a substantial minority belong to the so-called “underground church”, attending Masses in unapproved venues and private homes.

Under Pope Francis, the Vatican has entered into an agreement with China in 2018 aimed at ending the division between the two Catholic communities by regularising the appointment of bishops. But the agreement, which was renewed last October for four years, has drawn criticism from some Catholics who fear it cedes too much influence to the Communist Party.

The liturgy at high Mass at the cathedral was indistinguishable from that in any Catholic church in Europe and the archbishop’s sermon focused on the importance of faith and repentance. His only reference to any political issue was at the start of Mass when he said he hoped that China and the Vatican would soon establish diplomatic relations.

The cathedral parish has five priests and one deacon, and in a convent behind the church live 50 nuns from the Congregation of St Joseph, a French order that has been in Beijing for more than 150 years. Although the Beijing diocese is more than 700 years old, created by an Italian Franciscan missionary in 1307, Fr Zhu describes the Catholic Church in China as a developing church.

“We would challenge our ministers, our church servers to watch how the developed church does things. Of course, number one, the standard for the Catholic Church, that’s Rome. So do whatever Rome does,” he said.

A small Chinese flag on Fr Zhu’s desk was the only symbol of the state I saw at the North Cathedral and his conversation was peppered with references to the Pope and his guidance to parishes. The cathedral has three groups undergoing the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults, the official Catholic process for joining the Church.

“Anybody can come here and say, I would like to learn more about becoming a Catholic and we just assist. To be a Catholic or to be a Christian in this country is also God’s calling.

“We just try to assist to make the seed of faith, the seed of belief, grow toward maturity,” Fr Zhu said.

The Chinese Communist Party is officially atheist, forbidding its 99 million members from practising religion and the early years of the People’s Republic of China saw the exile of foreign missionaries and the arrest of priests and bishops. After the foundation of the CCPA in 1957, Pope Pius XXII said anyone who took part in the consecration of bishops without the Vatican’s approval would be excommunicated.

Chinese Catholics who remained loyal to Rome formed the underground church, but after 1966 the Cultural Revolution saw the systematic suppression and destruction of all religion.

Deng Xiaoping’s liberalisation brought a lighter touch to the regulation of religion and from 1981 Catholics were no longer obliged to pledge independence from the Pope and the Holy See. Restrictions tightened again in 1994 when all places of worship had to be registered with the government, opening the way for the arrest and prosecution of priests and bishops in the underground church for violating the regulation.

Meanwhile, bishops consecrated in the patriotic church without papal approval were not recognised by the Holy See while bishops in the underground church were seen by the Chinese authorities as illegitimate. The 2018 Provisional Agreement on the Appointment of Bishops, the text of which has never been published, was designed to regularise the status of bishops with an agreed system for approving them.

This meant that bishops would be nominated by the Chinese authorities but the Vatican would have a veto over their appointment. Pope Francis immediately readmitted to “full, ecclesial communion” eight bishops from the patriotic church who had been appointed without Vatican approval and some bishops from the underground church were recognised by the Chinese authorities.

Ten bishops have been appointed under the new system since 2018 and the Vatican has yet to object formally to anyone nominated by the Chinese authorities. After the agreement’s renewal last year, the Pope said “the results are positive, and we are working with goodwill”, adding that he was pleased with the Vatican’s dialogue with China.

Sergio Ticozzi is a Hong Kong-based Italian priest and an expert on the church in China whose books include China and the Catholic Church: Through Mutual Eyes. He believes the agreement is a very positive and effective channel for communication and dialogue, if both parties have a clear mutual understanding of what they are talking about but that China and the Vatican have different understandings of the terms at the heart of the agreement: bishops and appointment.

“For the Chinese authorities bishops are considered just public state officials, to be ‘democratically’ elected, while for the Vatican, they should be religious heads of a diocese or local church with a ‘sacred’ or divine authority,” he said.

“Consequently, the choice of the episcopal candidates by Chinese authorities is based mainly upon being a politically reliable person and obedient to the Government/Party, while for the Vatican they should have moral, doctrinal and pastoral qualifications.

“As far as the ‘appointment’ is concerned, the Vatican understands it as the handing down to the candidate of God’s authority upon a diocese, but for the Chinese side it simply means Vatican’s ‘agreement or approval’ of the elected candidate.”

Both the official church of the majority of Chinese Catholics and the underground church are in full communion with Rome, and the agreement’s supporters hope that it will help to bring the two communities together. The Holy See has told priests in the underground church that they should not be forced to register with the Chinese authorities but Fr Ticozzi says that they are under great pressure to do so.

“The Chinese authorities want clearly to eliminate this section of the Church, and exploit the ambiguous and silent attitude of the Vatican to achieve their objectivem” he said.

“They openly make use of the Sino-Vatican Agreement for this purpose: they do not show great concern about providing bishops for the more than 30 vacant dioceses, but prefer to propose their own episcopal candidate for dioceses which already have unofficial bishops, in order to force the Vatican to order the latter to accept the Government solution, which can be rather unjust.”

The Vatican is one of only a handful of states in the world that have diplomatic relations with Taiwan rather than with the People’s Republic of China, and Beijing would like to change that. Some in the Vatican see the establishment of diplomatic relations with Beijing as a desirable next step in the process of normalisation of which the 2018 agreement was a part.

Fr Ticozzi is pessimistic about the future of the church in China, noting a dimming of religious fervour among younger generations and a lack of spiritual guidance from above.

“The official emphasis will be on formal appearances, on external show of ceremonies, on the political interpretation and role of the clergy, since bishops and communities are required first to obey the Government’s orders,” he said.

“The official reports speak about various religious celebrations, construction of new churches, ordination of new priests and religious profession of new nuns, spiritual retreats and pilgrimages, religious symposia and study meetings.

“Several priests and sisters are truly very committed. But, the number of baptism of adults is not high, bishops are kept busy by the authorities in political meetings, tours and banquets, lay people often are left by themselves without a solid catechesis and spiritual formation.”

Cindy Yik-Yi Chu, a historian at Hong Kong Baptist University and the author of a number of books on the Catholic Church in modern China, is more upbeat. She believes the fact that there are no longer any illicit bishops in the Chinese church is a big step forward that will enable more dialogue.

“It’s very slow. But I think the Pope wants it very much and wants to have dialogue. Even before he became Pope he wanted to have dialogue with the Chinese church,” she said.

“I think that he was interested in working with the Chinese people because it’s a large population and there had be so many conflicts along the way. I think that’s the reason. It’s not something diplomatic or something like that. I think it’s just out of sincerity.”

Prof Chu acknowledges the sense of being abandoned felt by some in the underground church but argues that, since the Pope still accepts them as Catholics, they have not been forgotten. And she rejects the argument that the Church should not engage with the Communist Party.

“Should we just continue to hate them? That doesn’t do any good for the people,” she said.

Back in the North Cathedral, Fr Zhu was feeling optimistic too, noting that the convent has six new novices this year and that vocations for the priesthood are increasing steadily. When he returned from the Philippines in 2014, he was one of only a handful of priests in the diocese but now there are 91 and he says the change is visible.

“Every year, we get around two priests in the diocese of Beijing. An increase of two priests per year, that’s pretty good,” he said.

“I think there are some good signs. Maybe God really works in a very mysterious way.”


Featured Post

Priests demonstrate in Rome

 An interesting story from Global Catholic and worth a read https://www.globalcatholic.com /whose-nostra-aetate-the-churc h-judaism-israel-a...