Saturday, July 13, 2024

The desire for knowledge can make us believe lies

Former prisons minister in the Conservative government, Rory Stewart is currently presenting The Long History of Ignorance:  From Confucius to QAnon on BBC Radio 4. The programme airs on Thursday from 10.30 to 11.00am. It is also available on BBC Sounds

His central point is that in a society where we are taught that knowledge is power, we are all  busy trying to accumulate facts and explanations, and that this leads us to grave mistakes and, ultimately, to conspiracy theories. As he says, “the desire for knowledge can make us believe lies”.

Appearing on the programme are  Mary Beard, former archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams; Derry-born singer-songwriter Neil Hannon and former head of MI5 Jonathan Evans. And there is also any number of academics including Michael Ignatieff.

They’re all saying that there is so much we don’t know. “We don’t know how the brain works, and that’s a pretty big question,” says Stuart Firestein, who is a neurobiologist. 

You can’t help feeling that the series does not make enough of some of its remarkable contributors. This is especially the case with Derek Black, who is the son of Don Black, and grew up in a loving home which was also the centre of a white supremacist website, promoting the conspiracy theory of evil Jewish cabals running the world, and the intellectual inferiority of black people and other racist beliefs. Derek Black is very interesting about how he came to abandon racial hatred, not by being argued with, but by making Jewish friends and being accepted by them. 

The episodes cover different areas of human endeavour including psychology, creativity and politics. The politics episode is particularly interesting given Stewart’s previous career. He held six ministerial portfolios in four years. At one point, he says, he had to address the British parliament on the subject of Africa, a continent of 42 countries about which he knew next to nothing.

He argues, in this religion of knowledge, something has been lost.

Stewart walked across Afghanistan, covering up to 35 kilometres a day.

Friday, July 12, 2024

High-profile Catholics with close links to Donald Trump

This article is from the National Catholic Reporter. There are many priests and bishops too who support Trump.

The Trump phenomenon is extraordinary, scary too. And it is only scratching the surface of a worrying trend.
There is one small inaccuracy in it. Steve Bannon is currently in prison.

A number of high-profile Catholics have ties to, and influence on, Donald Trump. Here is a brief overview of some key Catholic advisers and supporters who are expected at the GOP convention in Milwaukee next week.

Thursday, July 11, 2024

Cocaine sniffers can’t talk about supporting the environment

The Irish Times on Saturday carried a story titled 'Irish drugs trade grows its links with Colombia'.

The article, written by Conor Lally, describes how Irish criminals have become embedded in the Colombian cocaine trade and of the changing times in the Irish drug trade.

A kilogram of cocaine in Ireland costs €40,000.

Below is an excerpt from the informative article.

Garda Assistant Commissioner  Justin Kelly has recently returned from Colombia. He says more Irish criminals are relocating there to act as brokers for gangs.

Assistant Commissioner Justin Kelly says when he was in Colombia, police and other officials there “cannot believe” how “disconnected” European drug users are from the human and environmental cost of growing the coca crops used to make cocaine.

One kilo of cocaine required 400kg of coca leaf to produce. That production process, pre kilo, used “274 kilo of gasoline” and potassium permanganate, a chemical used as legal medicine, often for the treatment of wounds. Kelly said the waste from the cocaine production process was “being dumped into the rivers, some of them in the Amazon basin”. There was also 230,000 hectares being used to grow coca in Colombia and much of that space had been acquired through deforestation, which had caused “irreversible” environmental damage.

He said some people in Ireland “were driving their electric vehicles and had their eco credentials with their shopping” and yet they were also taking cocaine, which was “absolutely destroying” much of the environment in Colombia. Furthermore, many of the same people in Ireland would espouse human rights-based views but were disconnected from the fact human rights activists in South America were being murdered for opposing narco groups.

“It’s directly related to the drugs that people are taking here and the Colombians, the ones I met, just cannot believe there’s a disconnect,” he said.

Wednesday, July 10, 2024

A new British government and chance of football victory

When England beat the West Germans in the World Cup in the summer of 1966 Harold Wilson was prime minister. A Labour government had been in power since October 1964. They had been in opposition since 1951.

At the time of the Word Cup victory is was said it gave Wilson and his government a great fillip.

Victory this evening and again on Sunday might be no harm at all for the new Labour government.

Remembering the shooting of Kevin O’Higgins

On this day, July 10, 1927 Kevin O’Higgins TD, vice-president of the Executive Council of the Irish Free State was assassinated by the IRA.

O’Higgins was on the pro-Treaty side in the Civil  War. He signed the execution orders of 77 prisoners. In a revenge act he was shot by the IRA in Booterstown.


Tuesday, July 9, 2024

More to AIB/GAA ad than meets the eye?

This week’s Mediahuis Irish regional newspaper’ column.

Michael Commane

Standing at a bus shelter earlier this week I spotted an advertisement that caught my eye.vI felt there is something about it that could easily be misread or misinterpreted.

We see the backs of two young people, probably sitting on the bonnet of a car. Above them in large lettering is written IT’S OUR COUNTY and below, IT’S IN OUR BLOOD. Below that again, in much smaller print #THETOUGHEST. On the left bottom corner GAA logo explaining the advert is supporting the football All-Ireland championship and beside that, AIB logo stating that they are the official sponsors.


The word blood made me nervous as did the word toughest. Using the word blood in any sort of metaphorical manner makes me nervous.


Just look what happened in Germany less than 100 years ago when they were led to believe their blood was the purest and the toughest. It ended in the slaughter of tens of millions of people.


There is a subliminal hint, there is something special, something better and superior about the Irish and their county, and specifically those who play GAA. 


Also, that they are ‘the toughest’. What about if you don’t play GAA and are not Irish, nor tough, does that mean there is nothing special about you?


I can see you saying I’m being hyper sensitive, that I’m reading far too much into a commercial ad that is trying to attract people to go to games and open accounts with AIB.


The moment we start making one group better than another we are heading down a dangerous road. I can still remember as a child genuinely believing that Catholics were different, maybe better than Protestants. The evil and hatred that has been caused by one group of people thinking they are better than another is the trick that powerful people use to fool and cajole us into thinking the worst of other people. 


Isn’t ethnic cleansing all about getting rid of people, who have different blood than we have?


I have not heard a murmur of complaint about the ad. Why is that? How is it that some things manage to garner publicity, and then there are other issues to which we close our eyes. Once the seeds of an outcry appear, the matter can gain traction and it becomes a national issue.


In writing this column I spoke to people about the ad. Some felt I was overreacting but a psychiatrist agreed with me, as did her academic husband. Interesting.


The GAA/AIB advert could be manipulated by those who love to hate the other. Of course we all want ‘our team’ to win. Nothing is ever simple, language is nuanced. 


In these scary days when the world is lurching towards right-wing authoritarianism, the slightest misinterpretation can snowball down a dangerous road. 


We need to be extremely careful with our words; advertisers, sports organisations, all of us. We should remind ourselves of that proverb: ‘There’s many a slip ’twixt the cup and the lip’.

Monday, July 8, 2024

Four lines from Psalm 41

Like the deer that yearns

for running streams,

so my soul is yearning

for you my God.

    -Lines from Psalm 41

Sunday, July 7, 2024

The idolatrous calling down of God’s name

US President, Joe Biden in his interview on CBS on Friday said that it would only be the ‘Lord Almighty' who could make him drop out of the upcoming presidential election. 

Before the  recent elections in India prime minister Narendra Modi claimed not to have been 'biologically born' but created by God and sent to India as his instrument to govern it.

He reasserted his divine status to the NDTV news channel on May 25 by stating that God had sent him for a specific purpose, and when that covenant was concluded, he would consider his work completed.

“God doesn’t reveal his cards,” Mr Modi said, “but he just keeps making me do things.”

Republican putative candidate for US election Donald Trump admits to having a number of Bibles in his house.

Regularly we see pictures of Vladimir Putin lighting candles in Orthodox churches and blessing himself.

Surely people of great power misusing God’s name?

And another comment about the God question. Are the Christian churches really on the side of the poor, marginalised, the different, the downtrodden, the poor, the weak, the unimportant, the very people for whom Jesus spent his time caring?

As the Leaving Cert examination paper would ask: compare and contrast.

And then all the misplaced/unhelpful liturgical ritual: two terms come to mind 'liturgical lap dancing' and 'clerical pornography’.

Probably provocative, but didn't the pharisees and Scribes consider Jesus to be provocative. Why did they crucify him? Did he ever dress in a manner which made him stand out from the crowd? Most likely not.

It’s so easy to forget the Commandment that we should not place false gods in front of us.

Saturday, July 6, 2024

Not believing, but hoping

The article below, which appeared in the magazine section of last weekend’s Financial Times, was written by Patrick Freyne, who is a feature writer with The Irish Times.

Freyne picks on some of the emotive subjects, not a word about the ideas of Trinity or Resurrection. He doesn’t once mention the historical Jesus. Not a word about what happened after Vatican II and Liberation Theology.   To say Catholics don’t read the Bible is almost caricature. Nevertheless, it’s worth reading.
______________________

"When I was very young, a relative, probably trying to say something comforting, told me that when adults died they became saints, and when children died they became angels. Apart from being theologically inaccurate (Catholics aren’t really into Bible reading) it was also, to my child brain, absolutely horrifying. 

When I thought of angels, I thought of the painted cherubs that flocked to the feet of Our Lady in the sculptures at our local church in Cork. More specifically, I thought of the cherubs that were comprised of a chubby-cheeked baby head and wings. 

If I died now, I thought, I would spend all eternity as a floating flappy head. I then, rather understandably, became terrified of death. When I was growing up in the 1980s, religion was as much a source of fear as solace. We were surrounded by what some people dismissively call “Catholic kitsch”, but which I found genuinely frightening. St Christopher’s painted face glared down at me in the room I used to stay in at my grandparents’ house. 

At school there was a decapitated wooden head of John the Baptist in a glass case, his eyes rolling, painted blood pouring from his stump. There was nothing kitsch about it. 

While most of the priests I encountered had developed a kinder version of Catholicism, in which God was a sort of benign fog and hell was a metaphor, there were still a few who spoke softly of sinful souls and told us hell was a real place with horrifying demons, a lake of fire and true damnation. They always seemed more convincing. Somehow an angry God who might torture us for all eternity felt more robustly true than an amorphous entity argued about by thoughtful philosophers. 

In 1985, in what was probably a desperate psychic response to unstoppable secularisation, a few Irish people began to see holy statues moving. It started at a grotto in Ballinspittle in County Cork and spread to other locations around the country. Crowds would gather to watch statues, usually of the Virgin Mary, shed blood or gesture to the crowd or wobble slightly in the air. On television intellectuals talked about optical illusions and mass psychology, but I spent my childhood terrified of seeing an apparition. An appearance by Mary would confirm something for me that I didn’t want confirmed — a cosmology of heaven and hell and demons and salvation and damnation. I had nightmares about biblical scenes. 

And I developed an obsession with prayer. At the same time I was making my confirmation, during which I would be visited by the Holy Spirit, and my main concern was being allowed to wear a suit like the one Don Johnson wore in Miami Vice. Life is complicated. At 12, you can be simultaneously terrified of hell and have a strong desire to look like Don Johnson (I was allowed to wear the suit but not to roll up the sleeves or wear a T-shirt underneath, which defeated the purpose). 

I often hate how Irish Catholicism is written about outside of Ireland. It doesn’t get the complexity of it all, preferring to depict the populace as simple God-fearing peasants. Irish faith, even when I was growing up, wasn’t like American evangelism. There was a cognitive dissonance between how the adults around me could reckon with the eternal damnation of their souls while simultaneously complaining about new traffic restrictions or watching Dallas. That’s because religion was, for many Irish people in the 1980s, more about convention than strong belief. 

The church dominated education and medicine but despite all the holy (occasionally mobile) statues, few people talked much about religious faith and most distrusted those who did. 

Going to Mass was just good personal governance, like starting a pension or insuring your car. You didn’t bore people with the details. And you certainly didn’t get excited about it or talk about religion to a stranger. Yes, Jesus might be present in the Mass but don’t, for the love of Jesus, make a scene. Irish people have the same attitude to famous people to this day.  

I was looking for stronger stuff. In my teens I went a couple of times to a retreat for Charismatic Catholics (a sort of evangelical version of Catholicism) over in County Clare with my friend’s more religious family. 
They were lovely people, but they were engaged in exactly the sort of behaviour that was viewed suspiciously by the average Irish church goer: they talked about their relationship with Jesus (name-dropping). It was a gentle version of Catholicism with caravans and acoustic guitars, campfires and compassionate clergy who were interested in your ideas (rather than the middle-management types I was more familiar with). 

Every evening we would all walk barefoot up a stony road to a small chapel in the desolate Burren, where the priest was moved to tears by Christ’s sacrifice and people would lose themselves in a love for God that was ecstatic and emotional. When you’re in the midst of that it’s hard not to feel a presence that might be divine, but is probably, at least to the version of me writing this now, just what it feels like to be among the intensely loving faithful. Yet it’s the closest I’ve ever come to a visceral sense of belief, a religion without fear, and I can remember its power. 

Elsewhere in the country, faith was waning. A lot has been made of how the appalling revelations of clerical and institutional abuse that emerged in the 1990s and 2000s led to a reduction in Mass going, but the trend had started well before that. 

By the early 1990s, many families I knew were going to Mass less out of belief than habit. A few weeks after my youngest sibling stopped going, so did my parents. I think they were relieved. My own faith gradually wafted away. There was no big moment when it left me. At one end of my teens I was praying in terror, and at the other I was listening to Frankenchrist by the Dead Kennedys. I had, by this stage, met iconoclastically atheistic friends, and because I largely associated religion with either boring old Mass or a way to avoid hellfire, I happily took the opportunity to leave it behind. 

Over the years, I was in and out of contact with religion. The moments when I really missed belief were when I lost people I loved. I’m shocked at how easily I shed religion in my teens without ever contemplating its hard sell: everlasting life and seeing your loved ones after death. I think that’s because by my late teens, I didn’t really believe that I, or anyone I knew, was ever going to die. When my lovely religious friend died far too young, I found myself groping around for meaning and hoping for signs from him from beyond the grave. I spent a year perceiving him in the movement of trees or clouds or in strange sounds I heard in the night. A year of animism. (It’s not lost on me that the people watching moving statues in Ballinspittle were also just searching for signs.) The idea that people cease to exist was incomprehensible. I realised that my conception of dying, the one built in childhood, involved going somewhere. 

Religion is a map that takes you from birth to the world beyond. When people I loved died, I would instinctively look for that map only to see squiggles and gibberish and the contours of a place that didn’t exist. Yet that map was the only one I had. I read books about spiritualism and the astral plane that came embedded with poorly understood quantum physics. You know the stuff: complete bollocks I was still figuring things out. I read pseudoscientific books about spiritualism and the astral plane that came embedded with poorly understood quantum physics. 

You know the stuff: complete bollocks. Later, I read more thoughtful books by theologians like the former nun Karen Armstrong, and I realised faith wasn’t necessarily about certainty but could also be a ritualistic, collective practice performed by hopeful doubters. 

For others, the more mystically minded, religion was about contemplating the unknowable mysteries of existence. And when science answers some of these unknowable questions, these mystics can always move their gaze back to unknowable things because there are a lot of unknowable things and there always will be. Both of these were visions of religion I could get behind — collective hope and mystical contemplation — where literal belief was beside the point. I quietly slid my settings back from atheism to a sort of communion-curious agnosticism. 

Don’t get me wrong, nothing could ever lure me back to the Catholic Church, a power-hungry, misogynistic institution that has never truly reckoned with the terrible things it has done. Over the years, the evidence of institutional abuse grew and grew, and that stopped many of the lapsed from returning. 

The secular progressive Ireland that’s emerged is immeasurably better than the cruel church-ridden version I grew up with. I won’t go back. Instead, like other people who have lost their faith, I exhibit some latent religiosity. I sing religious folk tunes. I find myself buying scented candles that smell of Mass incense. 

And I sometimes pray. Not, I think, as a conduit to God, but as a frequency I can tune into, made up of millennia of people hoping. It isn’t quite the same as belief. Fifteen years ago, I went as a journalist to see people gather at Knock in County Mayo to see an apparition of the Virgin Mary predicted by a rogue mystic. 

Though Knock had been the site of Marian apparitions in 1879, these newer appearances were not sanctioned by the church (a local priest tied himself in knots explaining to me why the old apparitions were real and the new ones were not). Hanging about waiting for an apparition was, by the 21st century, very much fringe behaviour in Ireland. A few thousand people gathered in Knock Basilica before rushing to the car park to watch Our Lady appear in the grey sky (a man literally came running in and said, “She’s outside!”). In the car park I found people gasping at what they saw, which, depending on their level of faith, involved the sun moving in the sky, Mary blessing them or, in some cases, a detailed vision of God on his throne flanked by angels and saints and loved ones who had died. I spoke to those people. They really believed they saw these things. The journalists saw nothing but sun and clouds, but around us people were pointing and crying with joy. 

A small boy to my left kept saying, amid gasps of the crowd, “I can’t see anything! Is she there? What can you see?” I felt a little bit sorry for the boy. And I felt a little bit sorry for myself too.  

Friday, July 5, 2024

Church should rid itself of old sartorial habits

Fr Brendan Hoban writing in The Western People.

One of my favourite columnists is Liz Dodd who writes for The Tablet, an English Catholic paper, and sometimes in The Sunday Times. 


Liz is a young 30-something, has an unnatural shade of purple hair, a trendy haircut, five ear piercings and six tattoos and she is given, as part of her work, to cycling around Nottingham in a t-shirt and jump suit. At first sight not the kind of person I would normally want to read.


Oh! and by the way, she’s also a nun, a Sister of St Joseph of Peace, an ‘active’ congregation (as distinct from a contemplative ‘monastic’ order) and has made her first vows – of poverty, celibacy and obedience – at the end of a two-year novitiate. She is one of the few now entering religious life – just 11 in England and Wales in 2021, and of those only two made first vows this year. Liz was one of the two.

She lives in a convent with other sisters, refugees and young homeless people and sometimes she wonders, as do some family members and friends, why she gave up what she describes as ‘a dream gig as a travel, food and drink writer and her boisterous London houseshare’. She is, in short, the kind of nun that prompts the question: ‘She’s not a nun, is she?’

But she is. Her congregation’s charism (or mission) is peace through justice. They listen for God’s promptings in particular in the voices of the marginalised and their focus is on those society often excludes – in her case, asylum seekers and young homeless – including those marginalised by the Church: gay and transgender people and women. The God she encounters (usually when out running) is in soup kitchens and foodbanks and raves. It is a love, she believes, that will outlast the questions, the trendy haircut, even the tattoos.

For those of us who remember the staid, permanent world of religious life in the past with uniforms, habits and various forms of nonsense and incarceration, the image of the new nun courtesy of Liz Dodd seems a once-off curiosity. But, apparently, she seems to be exactly the kind of person God is calling into religious life at the moment – as she describes them – ‘risk-takers, in-between people, who thrive on uncertainty’. It’s obvious now that religious life as a stable, fixed entity with huge numbers of young women dedicated to teaching or nursing or parish work is well past its sell-by date.

I sometimes wonder whether the Liz Dodds of a different Church and their refusal to bend the knee to the traditions of the past by their ease with ‘modern’ dress have a message for the rest of us.

I remember once in Croke Park, on one of those recent painful All-Ireland days when Mayo conspired not to ‘bring Sam home’, seeing four priests dressed from head to toe in jackdaw black. It was a startling image, incongruous and almost defiant against the background of a sea of colour and life and energy. It seemed as if the black suit was an extension of their personalities, as if their role had consumed the person, as if they dressed any differently it would have meant leaving something of themselves at home.

Or maybe it was just that their wardrobes didn’t extend to dressing casually. Yet the rest of the human race can sometimes leave their uniforms at home. In Croke Park on that day soldiers weren’t wearing their uniforms. Nurses weren’t wearing their whites. Chefs weren’t in their high hats. Vets weren’t in their wellies. Barristers weren’t in their silly wigs. Yet for the men in black, it can mean black every day of the year, even on All-Ireland day. It’s like having a second skin we’ve grown into over the years.

In the 1940s and 1950s, students for the priesthood seemed to be everywhere. Like blackbirds. Black suits, black ties, sometimes even a black hat. (I remember at 18 years of age being turned back by a Dean of Discipline at the gates of Maynooth College as I was going home for Christmas because I wasn’t wearing my hat!)

Strangely, younger priests seem to have a natural preference for black, favouring the old stock and wide collar, even (it is whispered) wearing black socks. They love wearing the long soutane (or cassock), walking confidently up the Church as it swishes around them, throwing back the lapels to reveal a touch of black silk.  Capturing the good, old days when priests were everywhere and where they really were ‘the men in black’.

I notice now that the long black soutane seems to have disappeared in Maynooth, apart from formal liturgical occasions. In my time we wore it all day, even going to football matches. It had a symbolic significance as if representing the limited, enclosed clerical world we inhabited. It was the opposite of what Liz Dodd’s modern dress represents, a freedom to say what you think and to be the person you are.

In a recent column in The Tablet, Liz takes issue with some of comments made by the Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith on gender ideology and registers her disappointment with its head, Archbishop Fernandez, a celebrated liberation theologian. In another column, she criticises some decisions of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales in relation to the publication of the New Lectionary – the book used for scripture readings at Mass. She is unhappy that the translation used; unhappy too that the new version retains masculine pronouns – or sexist language; and unhappy that the New Lectionary with ‘gold-blocking, gilded edges and multiple ribbon markers’ costs £695. 

Liz describes the bishops’ decisions in relation to the Lectionary as ‘wasteful and scandalously unjustifiable for a Church that ought to be prioritising the needs of the poorest in our communities’. Would that our Church, like the Sisters of St Joseph of Peace, give us all the freedom and the courage to say what we think. As Liz Dodd does.

‘I’ve become a nun’, she says, ‘but the tattoos are non-negotiable’.

Brendan Hoban: Church should rid itself of old sartorial habits.

Thursday, July 4, 2024

Defence Forces must be held to higher standards

Kathy Sheridan’s column in The Irish Times yesterday. Recommended reading for priests and bishops.


Some will recognise the feeling. That visceral punch when a member of the organisation becomes a public scandal and suddenly the whole body is under white-hot public scrutiny. 

How the group responds in those delicately balanced early days may well decide the fate of the organisation. 

Even the most PR-hostile company advocates will be aware of one guiding principle. A furious lash of defensiveness may be an understandable human response but the message it sends is the opposite of self-awareness, the truth-searching and unwavering sense of purpose outsiders will look for in the reputational debris. 

This is the problem for those Defence Forces advocates currently complaining about feeling collectively demonised and clearly getting a taste of victimhood themselves. 

Last Friday, Senator Gerard Craughwell addressed his “dear friends and colleagues of the Defence Forces” on Twitter/X to say that he felt “deserted and thrown under the bus to suit a number of political agendas uniformed and civilian”, that “our most senior officers are following the Taoiseach & Tánaiste and losing the military dressing room” and that as “proud servants of the State”, he and they were owed an apology for the way they were being treated.

In some ways, it’s hard to blame them. In this part of Co Kildare, where some Defence Forces members live among us, what we see is not raw aggression or predatory behaviour but hands-on community engagement and generosity of spirit.

But when Craughwell and Cathal Berry TD – consistent informed voices for a bafflingly neglected pillar of the State – ask aloud whether the Defence Forces are any worse than any other department of the civil or public service, the premise of the question is wrong. 

The Defence Forces is the sector under scrutiny. It’s also a vital pillar of the State currently having its complaints processes scrutinised in a tribunal of inquiry triggered by members’ disclosures.

Yesterday, the sense of vindication from what Craughwell called “the voiceless” was palpable when the Journal reported that no further Garda action was planned arising from an independent review of about 26 of those Women of Honour complaints. 

Though another 10 remain under investigation, the online claims of “deafening” department silence imply that this is the end of it. No matter that the disclosures echo allegations which date back at least 25 years, when Tom Clonan (now a Senator) first blew the whistle.

What we do know is that a soldier stated in court to be exemplary in his workplace revealed an entirely different persona outside it. That Natasha O’Brien was asking him to stop expressing deeply homophobic comments when he launched a violent, unprovoked assault on her, an attack clearly visible on CCTV.

And that such was the public outcry surrounding his lenient sentence that the Government asked the Defence Forces for details of any other serving personnel convicted of crimes or facing criminal charges.

The first answer was about 20 names but, when asked again, the Defence Forces’s list suddenly ballooned to 68. Are there more ? The point is that no one knows. 

We know that it’s up to the accused or convicted member to inform his commander where the gardaí fail to do so. How many do so ? We don’t know. All this remember, has come to public notice as a result of Natasha O’Brien’s fightback. Remember, too, that this is an organisation whose central plank, as expressed in the Vision 2030 document, is “transforming our culture”. That aspiration didn’t stem from an existing well of care, safety and egalitarianism.

Still Berry and Craughwell want to know why similar scrutiny shouldn’t be extended to the wider public sector given the widespread evidence of rape, sexual harassment and bullying throughout society. Craughwell listed the HSE, the prison service and the ambulance service as appropriate places to begin before moving on to the Civil Service and political parties.

The point of this is hard to fathom.

The swing to rage and whataboutery is neither reassuring nor constructive. Who does it serve? The Defence Forces are not a branch of healthcare or just another line of government-paid work. Their raison d’etre is reason enough for a particularly onerous level of scrutiny.

Defence Forces members are pledged to defend Irish sovereignty, protect Irish citizens and secure Ireland’s interests. They take an oath of allegiance in which they swear to be “faithful to Ireland and loyal to the Constitution”.

Their ethos of service to the State, a code of honour shared with many armies, is captured in six values “fundamental to sustaining Óglaigh na hÉireann as a steadfast pillar of the Irish State”.

Knowing what we do of those who honour those values and those who breach them, criminally and otherwise, the list is almost painful to read. Respect. Loyalty. Selflessess. Moral courage. Integrity.

The one that distinguishes them from your average government-paid employees is physical courage: “You must have the physical courage to persevere with the mission regardless of dangers and difficulties. Physical courage comes with commitment and professionalism.”

On the opening day of the Defence Forces Tribunal two weeks ago, Ms Justice Ann Power laid out her view of the forces at their best: “Honour is a cardinal value in the Defence Forces, it is a priceless and hard-won virtue. 

It means doing what is right. It means standing up for the truth, the whole truth, even if standing alone. Being a person of honour may at times call upon one’s greatest resources of courage and contributing personal integrity ”

Not quite the same as a civil servant.

Wednesday, July 3, 2024

Germans embrace Poles, Dutch gets right wing government

Polish and German government leaders met in Warsaw yesterday. The main item on the agenda was to improve relations between the two nations, which had deteriorated under Poland’s previous government and to declare responsibility for Europe’s security in turbulent times.

No German chancellor could travel to Poland without apologising for the slaughtering behaviour of an earlier generation of German leaders and their people. And that’s what Olaf Scholz did yesterday in Warsaw, where he also referred to the rising at the Warsaw Ghetto. 

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz traveled with 12 ministers and government officials, including Defence Minister Boris Pistorius, for the meeting in Warsaw.

“We bring a very clear message: Germany and Poland are good neighbours, close partners and reliable friends. And we want to create a new dynamic for our cooperation,” Scholz told a joint news conference with Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk.

He stressed that “close partnership between Germany and Poland is very important to us.”

The two pro-European leaders were tightening ties at a time when support is surging in Europe for eurosceptic far-right parties and days after first round of elections in France, which brought the far right closer than ever to government.

It’s significant on the day the Germans apologised to Poland, in the Netherlands a new government is appointed with a majority of the cabinet being far right parliamentarians.

Tuesday, July 2, 2024

The genius of the Michael Healy-Rae Brand

This week’s Mediahuis Irish regional newspapers’ column.

Michael Commane

Michael Healy-Rae came to mind in recent days. His cap, his dress, his accent could well be described as a brand. One might say that it is as clever and as distinguishable a brand as was the late Sir Anthony O’Reilly’s Kerrygold, which proved a worldwide marketing phenomenon.


It’s many years since I first met Michael. I was exiting from what was then called Tralee General Hospital when Michael approached me to say hello to me. 


It was a Friday evening, after work and I was tired. I had called to visit my elderly sick father in the hospital. I don’t quite know what came over me but as soon as he said hello I made some sort of unfriendly comment implying that he had no idea who I was and had only said hello as some sort of political stunt. Like a flash and as calm as a cucumber he replied: ‘Commane you’re as nasty in reality, as you are in the paper.’ And said in a strong Kerry accent. 


As spontaneous and as quick as that. Pure genius. I was dumbfounded. Naturally I did an immediate and complete somersault, profusely apologising for my bad behaviour. 


It did not take a feather out of him and he graciously accepted my apology. We ended up chatting and laughing. He enquired about my father and told me he was visiting a good friend of his, who was very unwell. We exchanged telephone numbers. I actually think that he went to the trouble of calling to my father that evening. It must be over 20 years since that happened and since then we have been on the phone to one another and have exchanged text messages.

 

On one occasion five minutes after I had done ‘A Word in Edgeways’ on RTÉ Radio 1, he sent me a complimentary text message. And that was before 6.30 in the morning.


I was thinking of all this while watching him on Prime Time discussing climate change issues with a Green Party Senator. Of course he had his cap on. 


It’s his brand. Imagine if any other politician appeared on television wearing a peaked cap, would’t we be surprised. He wears it in the Dáil. Isn’t that what his father before him did? 


I’m sure I’ve never seen him without his cap on. And then there’s his accent. It’s a perfectly defined strong Kerry accent. I think it’s fair to say he thrives on it. 


I doubt there is a person in the country who is not aware of Michael Healy-Rae. He is synonymous with Kerry.


In the days leading up to the election of a new leader of the Green Party I was back thinking of him. It struck me listening to different members of the Green Party it was close to impossible to identify their accents. 


Indeed, not just with the Green Party, across the political divide, it is becoming more and more difficult to link the majority of politicians with their county. Good or bad? 


But so it is with so many people today, ‘strong accents’ are disappearing. Is there a link between social class and how we speak? Of course there is.


But Michael Healy-Rae breaks all the rules. It’s part of his brand. All that and not a word about his political views. I wonder why?

Featured Post

The ubiquitous mobile phone can be enemy number one

Seen in Dublin's Rathmines yesterday; a Garda car being driven by an officer, while using his mobile phone.  Some metres behind the Gard...