Monday, January 12, 2026

Peace can’t be sought through weapons - Pope Leo

Pope Leo is standing out as a statesman. Compare his words with spoken by his fellow countryman, the current US president at his press conference on Friday. Every word out of Donald Trump’s mouth, if it’s not silly, it’s inaccurate and most times vulgar. And then there is an another American. Pope Leo.

Meeting members of the Diplomatic Corps, Pope Leo XIV warns that human rights and freedoms are under strain as diplomacy gives way to the logic of power and war.

The text below is from the Vatican News website.

Warning that “war is back in vogue” and that peace is increasingly sought through force rather than justice, Pope Leo XIV issued a strong appeal for humility, dialogue, and a renewed commitment to multilateralism in his address to the Diplomatic Corps accredited to the Holy See.


Speaking on Friday, 9 January, during the traditional exchange of New Year greetings, the Pope cautioned that the foundations of international coexistence are being steadily undermined, as diplomacy based on dialogue gives way to the logic of power and deterrence.


“The principle established after the Second World War, which prohibited nations from using force to violate the borders of others, has been completely undermined,” he said, warning that such a mindset gravely threatens the rule of law itself.


A defining moment in the Vatican’s diplomatic year

The annual meeting between the Pope and Ambassadors accredited to the Holy See is considered one of the most significant moments in the Vatican’s diplomatic calendar.


Often dubbed the "State of the World" Address, the Pope's discourses in these occasions tend to offer a moral reading of international life - an appeal not to interests, but to conscience - offered at the beginning of a new year as a call to responsibility, restraint, and renewal.


For Pope Leo XIV, who said the occasion is “a new experience,” having been called only months ago to “shepherd Christ’s flock,” the address also served to articulate the moral horizon within which the Holy See understands diplomacy: a patient work of encounter, a defence of the vulnerable, and a commitment to peace rooted in truth.


Borders, law, and the return of “peace through weapons”

Pope Leo XIV lamented the weakening of the principle established after the Second World War, by which nations pledged not to use force to violate the borders of others.


“The principle… has been completely undermined,” he said, warning that peace is increasingly sought “through weapons as a condition for asserting one’s own dominion,” a mentality that “gravely threatens the rule of law, which is the foundation of all peaceful civil coexistence.”


The Pope turned repeatedly to Saint Augustine to support his points, especially to De Civitate Dei (The City of God), in which Augustine reflects on pride, power, and the illusion of security.


Even those who wage war, the Pope recalled, ultimately desire peace - yet not peace as a shared good, but peace as possession. Citing Augustine, he said, “They do not, therefore, wish to have no peace, but only the peace that they desire.”


It was precisely this distortion, the Pope implied, that led humanity into catastrophe in the twentieth century. 


From that tragedy, he noted, the United Nations emerged, established eighty years ago as a centre of multilateral cooperation “for safeguarding peace, defending fundamental human rights and promoting sustainable development.”


Humanitarian law “must always prevail”

From the principles of law, Pope Leo XIV moved to the concrete cost of war - especially when civilians become targets, and when essential infrastructure is destroyed.


“I would like to draw particular attention to the importance of international humanitarian law,” he said. Compliance cannot depend on “mere circumstances and military or strategic interests.”

Rather, he said, humanitarian law “is a commitment that States have made,” and “must always prevail over the ambitions of belligerents.”


He underscored that attacks on “hospitals, energy infrastructure, homes and places essential to daily life” constitute serious violations, and reiterated the Holy See’s condemnation of “any form of involvement of civilians in military operations.”


The moral measure, he insisted, is not advantage but dignity: “the protection of the principle of the inviolability of human dignity and the sanctity of life always counts for more than any mere national interest.”


Naming conflicts, appealing for peace

The Pope then applied this moral framework to specific crises across the world.


He spoke of the “ongoing war in Ukraine” and the suffering of civilians, reiterating “the pressing need for an immediate ceasefire,” and calling for dialogue “motivated by a sincere search for ways leading to peace.”


He appealed to the international community not to waver, and reiterated the Holy See’s willingness “to support any initiative that promotes peace and harmony.”


In the Holy Land, he noted that despite a truce announced in October, civilians continue to endure “a serious humanitarian crisis.”


He reaffirmed attention to initiatives aimed at guaranteeing Palestinians in Gaza “a future of lasting peace and justice,” and reiterated that the two-State solution remains the institutional perspective for meeting the aspirations of both Palestinians and Israelis. He also lamented increased violence in the West Bank against Palestinian civilians, who have “the right to live in peace in [their] own land.”


Pope Leo XIV also expressed concern about “escalating tensions in the Caribbean Sea and along the American Pacific coast,” renewing an appeal for peaceful political solutions.


He also addressed the crisis in Venezuela “in light of recent developments,” calling for respect for the will of the people and for the safeguarding of human and civil rights.


He invoked the witness of two Venezuelan saints canonised last October - José Gregorio Hernández and Sister Carmen Rendiles - as inspirations for building a society founded on “justice, truth, freedom, and fraternity.”


He spoke too of the violence and instabiliy in Haiti, calling for concrete international support. Likewise, he pointed to the Great Lakes region of Africa; Sudan and South Sudan; tensions in East Asia; and Myanmar’s humanitarian crisis, worsened by last March’s earthquake, and called for “peace and inclusive dialogue” and access to humanitarian aid.


Nuclear risk and the ethical governance of AI

At the root of many of these crises, Pope Leo XIV said, lies the persistent belief that peace is possible only through force and deterrence. Yet peace, he warned, requires continuous construction and vigilance - especially among those with the greatest capacity for destruction.


He pointed to the urgency of nuclear arms control, noting the impending expiry of the New START Treaty in February, and warned of a return to an arms race with increasingly sophisticated weapons, including those shaped by artificial intelligence.


AI, he said, “requires appropriate and ethical management,” together with regulatory frameworks that protect freedom and human responsibility.


Migrants, prisoners, and the Jubilee’s “structural” spirit

The Pope’s defence of dignity extended to migrants and prisoners - two groups often treated as problems rather than persons.


“Every migrant is a person,” he said, and therefore has “inalienable rights that must be respected in every situation.” 


Not all migration is chosen. He explained that many flee “violence, persecution, conflict, and even the effects of climate change.”


Marking the seventy-fifth anniversary of the International Organisation for Migration (IOM), the Pope warned that efforts against crime and trafficking must not become a pretext “for undermining the dignity of migrants and refugees.”


He also spoke of prisoners, insisting they “can never be reduced to the crimes they have committed.” He thanked governments that responded to Pope Francis’ Jubilee appeal for gestures of clemency, and expressed hope that the Jubilee spirit would inspire justice systems “permanently and structurally,” ensuring humane conditions and proportionate penalties.


Above all, he stressed, this includes abolishing the death penalty, which the Pope called a measure that “destroys all hope of forgiveness and renewal.” He did not forget “prisoners held for political reasons in many countries.”


The crisis of language and the shrinking of freedom

Another theme of the Pope's address was the warning about language itself: its weakening, its manipulation, and its conversion into an instrument of harm.


“Rediscovering the meaning of words is perhaps one of the primary challenges of our time,” he said, because when words lose their connection to reality, reality itself becomes “debatable and ultimately incommunicable.”


He recalled how Saint Augustine describes two people forced to remain together without a shared language: “dumb animals… understand each other more easily than these two individuals,” Augustine writes; indeed, “a man would more readily converse with his dog than with a foreigner!”


Yet, the Pope warned, semantic ambiguity today is not merely accidental. “Language is becoming more and more a weapon with which to deceive, or to strike and offend opponents,” he said, calling for words “to express distinct and clear realities unequivocally,” so that authentic dialogue can resume - in families, in politics, in the media, on social media, and in international relations.


He noted a paradox: this weakening of language is often defended “in the name of freedom of expression,” yet, “on closer inspection, the opposite is true,” because freedom is protected precisely when language is anchored in truth.


“It is painful to see how, especially in the West, the space for genuine freedom of expression is rapidly shrinking,” he said, warning of “a new Orwellian-style language” which, while seeking to be inclusive, “ends up excluding those who do not conform.”


Freedom of conscience and religious freedom

From language, the Pope moved to rights increasingly threatened in contemporary societies: freedom of conscience and religious freedom.


He defended conscientious objection as a safeguard for dignity, noting that “Conscientious objection is not rebellion, but an act of fidelity to oneself.” It reflects the truth that a free society “does not impose uniformity but protects the diversity of consciences,” preventing authoritarian tendencies and fostering ethical dialogue.


Religious freedom, the Pope said, is also at risk. Quoting Pope Benedict XVI, he recalled it as “the first of all human rights.” He noted that violations are rising worldwide, with “sixty-four percent of the world’s population” suffering serious violations of this right.


The Holy See, he said, asks full respect for Christians, and “the same for all other religious communities.” 


On the sixtieth anniversary of Nostra Aetate, he reiterated the “categorical rejection of all forms of antisemitism,” and stressed the importance of Jewish-Christian dialogue and deeper common roots.


At the same time, he said, the persecution of Christians remains among the most widespread human rights crises today, affecting “over 380 million believers worldwide,” with high or extreme levels of discrimination and violence.


He recalled victims of violence in Bangladesh, the Sahel, and Nigeria, and those killed in the terrorist attack last June on the parish of Saint Elias in Damascus, as well as victims of jihadist violence in Cabo Delgado, Mozambique.


He also pointed to subtler discrimination against Christians even in majority-Christian societies, including in Europe and the Americas, where Christians may be restricted from proclaiming the Gospel - especially when they defend “the dignity of the weakest, the unborn, refugees and migrants, or promote the family.”


The right to life

Pope Leo XIV reaffirmed that the right to life is the foundation of every other right and warned that the contemporary human rights framework risks losing its vitality when rights become detached from reality and truth.


“In the current context, we are seeing an actual ‘short circuit’ of human rights,” he said, as fundamental freedoms - speech, conscience, religion, even life - are restricted “in the name of other so-called new rights,” creating space for force and oppression.


The Pope spoke about the family as the privileged place where human beings learn to love and to serve life.

He described two urgent challenges: the tendency to marginalise the family’s role in the international system, and the painful reality of fragile families afflicted by hardship and domestic violence.


He reiterated the Church’s categorical rejection of practices that “deny or exploit the origin of life" as well as projects that assist people in doing so. Public resources, he said, should support mothers and families rather than “suppress life.” 


Seeds of peace and the courage to forgive

Despite the gravity of his diagnosis, Pope Leo XIV insisted that peace remains “a difficult yet realistic good.” 


Quoting Augustine, he called peace “the aim of our good,” a foretaste of the City of God even within the earthly city.


Peacemaking, he said, requires “humility and courage: the humility to live truthfully and the courage to forgive.” These virtues, he added, are revealed at Christmas - when Truth becomes humble flesh - and at Easter, when the condemned Righteous One forgives and grants life as the Risen One.


Bringing his discourse to a close, Pope Leo pointed to signs of hope: the Dayton Accords that ended the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina thirty years ago; the Joint Declaration of Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan signed last August; and efforts by Vietnamese authorities to improve relations with the Holy See. These are “seeds of peace,” he said, that must be cultivated.


Looking ahead to October’s eighth centenary of the death of Saint Francis of Assisi, “a man of peace and dialogue,” the Pope concluded by invoking the saint’s witness of humility and truth, and wishing “a humble and peace-loving heart” for all at the beginning of the new year.

Sunday, January 11, 2026

Thomas Casey OP (1933 - 2026) - an obituary

Brother Thomas Casey was born in

Tom Casey OP
Killarney, Co Kerry on August 26, 1933.

After school he joined the Cistercian Order in Roscrea where he made profession in 1960. Thomas was one of the first Cistercians to move to the new foundation at Bolton Abbey at Moone in County Kildare in 1965. Moone became independent of Roscrea in 1977 and the young Tom Casey stayed in Moone.

Thomas spent approximately 30 years with the Cistercians before joining the Dominican Order in 1992.

He spent most of his Dominican life at the retreat house in Montenotte in Ennismore in Cork. When that closed in 2022, Tom moved the few short kilometres to the Dominican Priory in Pope’s Quay on the north side of Cork city.

Although he had been a Cistercian he still had to do a noviciate with the Dominicans and he did that period of acclimatisation in Montenotte. His novice master and prior was Fr Ben Moran. On one occasion he told Ben he was the best novice master he ever had.

Tom greatly admired fellow Dominicans, the late Damian Lynch and Christopher O’Flaherty. Damian had a great way with people and Tom learned a lot from Christy’s gardening and farming skills.

On hearing of his death  Fr Ben said: “I really liked that man. He  was well suited to the Dominicans. He spoke and preached about God through his love for nature. He and I organised creation retreats, which were conducted in the garden in Ennismore, which involved celebrating Mass outdoors.”

He loved the freedom of the Dominicans, which allowed him to have a large number of acquaintances and friends. He was a good story teller, and Fr Joe Ralph explains how he found that space with the Dominicans.

In the years he spent in Montenotte he turned the grounds into an oasis of calm. It was his passion. Before he arrived in Monetenotte the two/three acre garden was a wilderness and Tom brought it to life.

He dedicated his life to the garden and he shared that love and passion with those who came on retreat to Montenotte. While not a professional or qualified gardner he knew about every tree and plant. He told retreatants about the ginkgo and the redwood tree in the garden. If a plant or flower was not developing as it should he would move it to a different place where it would thrive. He had a great sensitivity towards trees and plants.

On acquiring a drive-on lawnmower he invited his then prior, Fr Joe Ralph to come out and have a look at it. “Tom asked me did I recognise the registration number; it was JN 2015 ". Those familiar with St John’s Gospel chapter 20, verse 15 should spot the reference. Tom had a wiley sense of humour and a great smile too.

He saw the presence of God in nature and through that he was attracted to the works of Patrick Kavanagh, often reciting Kavanagh’s ‘Advent’ poem.

Fr Joe Ralph got to know Tom when he was in Bolton Abbey. Joe would bring young people from the inner city to nearby Dollardstown.

“Tom would show the children around the farm and introduce them to the animals. This was all new for the young people and they were thrilled with the experience, yes, fascinated,” Joe recalls.

Fr Ben remarked how Tom had a great love of the Psalms; he saw how the Psalms were intrinsically connected with nature.

Besides his gardening skills he was also a keen photographer and every year produced a calendar depicting scenes from nature.

He was a keen snooker player and while he was with the Cistercians in Moone it was known for him to sneak out the back door, dressed in civvies to head off to play a game or two of snooker in Carlow, indeed, it is believed he even made it to Dublin to pot the black.

Tom closely followed his native Kerry senior football team and relished in the magic of their footballing skills.

No doubt he was particularly proud of the current Kenmare duo Seán O’Shea and Stephen O’Brien.

May he rest in the garden of God's love

Thomas’ body will be lying in state in St Mary’s Church, Pope’s Quay, Cork from 4pm to 6pm on Thursday, January 15.

Funeral Mass in the church the following day, Friday, January 16 at 11am.

Saturday, January 10, 2026

Thomas Casey OP, RIP

Dominican brother Thomas Casey, died today in Mount Desert Nursing Home in Cork.

An obituary to follow. 

May he rest in peace. 


Even German Rail can’t beat the snow and ice

The train plays a special role 

in the German psyche.

Thursday and Friday Germany experienced heavy snow and temperatures down to minus 18 degrees Celsius.

The weather was the first item on the main ARD evening news yesterday.

Yes, motorways got a mention, as did a number of fatal road accidents on non-motorway roads but what  got the most attention was the news that Deutsche Bahn German Rail had come to a standstill in some regions across the country.

So did the plight of the homeless and in that bulletin we were told there are 50,000 homeless people across the country.

The prestige DB icon, Germany’s ICEs, stopped dead on tracks, at stations. Even many of their heated points had been beaten down by the snow and railway workers were out with simple shovels trying to free the frozen snow-covered points.

It is expected Germany’s trains will be back rolling today.

Germany can breathe again.

Friday, January 9, 2026

Trump doesn’t know Russia is a neighbour of the USA

US President Donal Trump held a press conference this evening, which was attended by oil executives.  He gave longwinded answers, making silly comments. He told many lies and said many strange things.

Speaking about Greenland he said that he would never want Russia to be a neighbour of the United States. Has he ever looked at a map and seen what country is next to Alaska?

He calls  people by names, calls a number of governors stupid and corrupt.

He tells the press corps that he will never allow windmills, that they are destroying the European countryside and killing too many birds.

No one dares disagree or correct him.

We are living in the weirdest of times.

Iarnród Éireann hides its logo on Belfast bound trains

Because there is now an hourly 

Irish Rail logo
rail service between Dublin and Belfast, both Irish Rail and Northern Ireland Railways have had to add extra rolling stock on the service.

Up to now the service was operated by trains built by De Dietrich in France. There are four sets of these trains in use, two operated by NI and two operated by IR. It is not possible to distinguish between NI and IR trains.

The extra rolling stock used by Irish Rail on the Dublin Belfast line are built by Hyundai Rotem in South Korea. These trains have the Irish logo on the side.


Because these trains are crossing into Northern Ireland it was deemed necessary the three colours, green, white and orange be removed from the logo.


There are plans to replace the old De Dietrich fleet with eight new, more sustainable trains through the Enterprise Fleet Replacement Programme.  


The sooner the better.



Thursday, January 8, 2026

Donald Trump’s destructive behaviour this time Venezuela

The link below is to an article in the current edition of the National Catholic Reporter.

With his invasion of Venezuela and capture of its leader, President Trump dares us to take stock, dares us to say that he has gone too far, and dares us to engage in acts of resistance equal to his destructive behaviour.

 https://www.ncronline.org/node/320996

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Is the Mass a celebration of prayer and inspiration?

The week’s column in The Kerryman newspaper.

Michael Commane

On the feast of the Holy Family, Sunday, December 28 I attended Mass as I was not rostered to celebrate Mass in a public church. I often smile silently to myself when I hear talk that there is a shortage of priests in Ireland.


The church in which I attended Mass was one of those big churches built in Ireland in the1950s and ’60s. 


It was a visiting priest celebrating the Mass, who introduced himself. I thought that was a lovely gesture. So often I’ve been to Mass and the priest never tells us who he is.


There are many aspects to the Mass. It’s at the centre of our faith. Catholics believe that Christ is really present in the Eucharist. But what does that mean for most of us? 


I once heard a holy and clever priest say that Christ is sacramentally present in the Eucharist and it’s what I say as well. That is not at all taking away from saying Christ is really present in the Eucharist. But Christ is not present in the Eucharist or Mass as I am present here writing these words. 


Christ speaks to us in the breaking of the bread and the reading of the Word.


The Last Supper was a meal, a fellowship experience with Christ at the centre; they were friends, people who respected and cared for one another. They were people who shared a common belief. I think it’s fair to say it would have been an intimate occasion. 


People in such a setting would inspire one another, they’d leave with a spring in their step. And then add to that, their belief that the man in their midst is God.


The Mass that I attended  spoke little or nothing to me. The priest carried out gestures, which had no symbolic meaning to me whatsoever; I doubt they made any sense to the majority of people in the church that day. 


All I can say about his sermon is that I have forgotten what he said but I can remember while he was preaching wondering where it was going.


The Mass was a wordy experience, lifeless too. I know the Mass is the Mass but I kept asking myself why would anyone come here on a Sunday morning over the season of Christmas. 


I thought of all the talk about synodality; there wasn’t a hint of it at this Mass. No offertory procession, no handshake of peace. For me the most uplifting aspect to the Eucharistic celebration was the music sung by the choir; it was uplifting and helped me to pray. Obviously the parish uses the local talent for its music needs.


There needs to be a far better link between priest and parishioners, parish councils must not be the hand picked pious people of the parish priest, instead people who will speak openly and honestly about their faith, the highs and lows of where they are with being a Christian. 


The Mass needs to be an honest and real experience of a living Christian community, an occasion to speak to and with God in words that have meaning for all involved.


Surely the Irish bishops know why people have lost interest in Mass on Sunday.

Tuesday, January 6, 2026

The Irish Times gets it wrong on wheelchairs on buses

Last week The Irish Times did a

series of articles highlighting the barriers faced by disabled people in Ireland to realising their rights to participate fully in eduction, employment, housing, transport and society.

In Friday’s article Kitty Holland wrote:

"The number 130 bus, being an older model, has only a front door, which Ms Smith has to awkwardly enter along with other passengers, and then manoeuvre her chair to the designated wheelchair spot, rather than through double doors located at the centre of the bus, as with more modern vehicles."

One must wonder when Ms Holland was last on a bus in Dublin. What research was done for the piece?

All double deck buses in the country have facility for wheelchairs. It involves the lowering of a ramp to allow a person to enter the bus in a wheelchair. This facility is always at the front door of the bus. It is explicitly stated on all buses that the ramp facility is at the front door. There is no facility on any bus anywhere in Ireland for such a facility at the middle double doors.

The vast majority of buses, all Dublin Bus vehicles, those with the letters SG, GT, PA, EW, AH have double doors. There is a number of older buses that do not have  double doors in the middle but that has nothing to do with wheelchair facility as that is always operated from the front door.

Also, GT registered buses work  the 130 route and these buses have middle double doors. But again, whether the bus has middle double doors or not, has little implication for those using wheelchairs.

All vehicles operated by Go Ahead have wheelchair facility and again this operates via the front door.

Ms Holland’s information is incorrect, indeed, most misleading, and certainly not fair to Dublin Bus.

Has The Irish Times corrected the error? Has Dublin Bus commented on the poor research?

Monday, January 5, 2026

Pope Leo calls for safeguarding Venezuela sovereignty

From Vatican News:

At the Angelus prayer on Sunday, Pope Leo XIV called for the good of the Venezuelan people to prevail, for the rule of law to be upheld, and for the human and civil rights of all to be respected.


Pope Leo XIV expressed his concern on Sunday over recent developments in Venezuela, after United States forces arrested Nicolás Maduro in Caracas on Saturday and brought him to New York for trial.


“The good of the beloved Venezuelan people must prevail over every other consideration and lead us to overcome violence and to undertake paths of justice and peace, safeguarding the country’s sovereignty, ensuring the rule of law enshrined in the Constitution, respecting the human and civil rights of each person and of all, and working to build together a serene future of collaboration, stability, and concord, with special attention to the poorest who suffer because of the difficult economic situation,” said the Pope at the midday Angelus prayer.


Speaking in St. Peter’s Square, Pope Leo invited everyone to pray for the Venezuelan people, assuring them of his own prayers.


He also entrusted all Venezuelans to the intercession of Our Lady of Coromoto, Patroness of Venezuela, St José Gregorio Hernández, and St. Carmen Rendiles.


Pope Leo XIV concluded his Angelus appeals with an invitation to trust in the God of peace.


“Let us continue to have faith in the God of peace,” he urged. “Let us pray and stand in solidarity with the peoples who suffer because of wars.”


Sunday, January 4, 2026

The ‘Putinization’ of US foreign policy arrives in Venezuela

From the Guardian:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/03/putin-russia-us-foreign-policy-venezuela?CMP=share_btn_url


If the US can run Venezuela why can’t Russia run Ukraine and China Taiwan?

It’s now over 24 hours since  Trump has invaded a sovereign nation and what have the major world powers to say.

If Trump is opposed to dictatorships why does he not drop a few bombs over China and Russia, even North Korea.

To give such power to a despot such as Trump has a lot to say about democracy.

Pope Leo celebrated a New Year’s Day Mass in St Peter’s Basilica and then delivered a special noontime prayer from his studio overlooking the piazza, which was full of pilgrims and tourists on the bright, chilly day.

January 1 marks the church’s World Day of Peace and pope Leo used the occasion to issue a prayer:

“Let us all pray together for peace: first, among nations bloodied by conflict and suffering, but also within our homes, in families wounded by violence or pain,” he said.

Did President Trump know January 1 is World Day of Peace?

What at all lies ahead of us for 2026?

Saturday, January 3, 2026

Who decides the common good? The privileged do

Below is Justine McCarthy ’s column in The Irish Times yesterday.

 While admitting it is the privileged who decide what the common good she has the decency to tell the reader that she lives in ‘pricey' Dún Laoghaire.

The philosophers and theologians have a lot to say about the common good, and the natural law too.

J McC’s column

Eileen Flynn posed a bombshell of a question in Leinster House last summer. The Independent Senator and Travellers’ rights activist was questioning representatives of business lobby group Ibec at a meeting of the Oireachtas Committee on Infrastructure and the National Development Plan about their report, entitled Our Infrastructure Ambition for a Competitive, Productive and Resilient Economy.

Zooming in on the proposition that the planning system should favour the common good over individual rights, she wondered: “Who decided what the common good is?” The common good tends to augment the uncommonly privileged, nobody replied.

Outside Leinster House’s sash windows, a parade of politicians’ parked cars flashed sunbeams across the lawn at their €335,000 bike shelter, installed courtesy of the public. Beyond the gates, tourists staying at nearby five-star hotels strolled in the shade of Merrion Square’s sycamores. Visiting Martians would have been impressed by the opulent tapestry. Visiting Dubliners might have thought they had landed on Mars.

For most people, reality is a constant battle with polluting traffic jams, undependable bus timetables, footpaths cluttered with unnecessary obstacles and queues for GP and mental health appointments. Our masters of the universe are seldom spotted trudging to work in the rain, waiting for a bed in a hospital or a domestic violence refuge, residing beside derelict buildings or on streets festooned with menacing anti-immigration flags.

Back in the committee room, the business delegates were arguing that adequate public infrastructure is essential for a competitive and resilient economy. Echoes of the primacy of wealth creation over the general populace’s quality of life bounced off the lovely walls.

Public administration is becoming an ever more entrenched class issue in Ireland. Budget 2026 provided a sharp reminder of this hierarchy in the contest of priorities. Tax breaks for builders and a VAT reduction for restaurateurs contrasted with zero payments to offset inflated household energy bills and an effective tax increase for many PAYE workers.

Vocal opponents

Warren Buffett, one of the world’s richest men, acknowledged there is a global them-and-us ideology in a New York Times interview in 2006. “There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war and we’re winning,” he confirmed, disapprovingly.

For evidence that money speaks, see the Government’s reversal of the 2:1 expenditure ratio of public transport to roads in the revised National Development Plan. At the same time, 21 per cent of rural dwellers say they feel impeded from spending time in nature by the lack of roadside footpaths, according to a Central Statistics Office study.

Some of the most vocal opponents of Dublin’s MetroLink are individuals who seem least likely to rely on the 18.8km rail line from Swords to Charlemont. It is a luxury they do not need because they can afford to live in multimillion-euro houses located in lush inner suburbs already replete with buses, trains and trams. They bask in the double advantage of their homes having become even more unaffordable to most mortals because of their proximity to Dart and Luas lines. An ironic twist in MetroLink’s long-running saga is that some Ranelagh residents complain the new rail system will deliver too many commuters to the sought-after locality which already has a Luas stop. Granted, they do have a point.

While some areas are spoilt for choice, others have zero to none. A recent report by the Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland found purchasers need salaries exceeding €108,000 to buy even a basic new apartment. Only the top 20 per cent earn enough to rent one. The upshot is that people – mostly young, and many with burgeoning families – have to move further and further away from their social networks and workplaces to acquire somewhere to live.

Once there, they find themselves stuck between a rock and a hard place. Many prospective homeowners might have felt optimistic when Dublin City Council rezoned land for the building of 5,300 houses near the planned Dart+ South West line that is to connect the city centre to Hazelhatch in Co Kildare. Their hopes were quickly dashed when, 11 days later, the Department of Transport revealed that the beginning of construction of Dart+ South West is to be delayed by four years.

While sprawling new towns are being built without adequate public services, some established, well-heeled ones seem immunised against any dilution of their exclusive cachet. The Office of the Planning Regulator has criticised Wicklow County Council for failing to rezone land around Greystones, a seaside shopping destination, opting instead to rezone land in Kilcoole. Despite property prices spiralling to the sky after the Dart was extended to the town, councillors say its public transport services are insufficient to accommodate newcomers.

The axiom “build them and they’ll come” is not always true. There are great tracts, especially in the capital city and its hinterland, where GPs are as rare as electric gates and golf clubs. It is no coincidence that among the worst-affected areas are the ones boasting the fewest millionaires. In Dublin’s north inner-city, there is one GP to every 3,525 residents, according to HSE data supplied in response to parliamentary questions by local Labour TD Marie Sherlock. A mile away in coastal Clontarf there is one GP to every 1,500 residents.

The north inner city is home to one of Ireland’s biggest prisons. Mountjoy is bursting at the seams with too many inmates, and few white-collar criminals among them. The area also contains a network of traffic rat-runs where fuel-guzzling cars whizz to important meetings or frequent-flyers’ departures at the airport.

When the Sunday Independent asked Tadhg Crowley, chair of the Irish Medical Organisation’s GP committee, about the dearth of local doctors in certain districts, he candidly identified one of the factors as doctors’ reluctance to live in areas of deprivation.

And who would blame them? (Not I, who lives on the high moral ground in pricey Dún Laoghaire).

The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission has called for the constitutional enshrinement of economic, social and cultural rights as a key to cohesion and inclusion. While we wait for that referendum, we can throw all the money in the national coffers at fixing our deficient infrastructure, but it will not be right. It is doomed not to serve the common good, that’s why.

Friday, January 2, 2026

An inside view of the evil of the death penalty

This from the Guardian.

Some weeks ago Pope Leo spoke out against the death penalty when he said that if people say they are opposed to abortion must also say they oppose the death penalty.

The US reporter who has witnessed 14 executions: ‘People need to know what it looks like’

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/01/reporter-witnessed-executions-capital-punishment?CMP=share_btn_url

In the last 24 hours this blog was
read in 73 countries around the world.
It is read in the shaded countries.

Thursday, January 1, 2026

Our names always have a story to tell about who we are

This week’s column in The Kerryman newspaper

Michael Commane

This time of year newspapers print a list of the most common names given to newborn children during the year.


My current job has me working with a large number of non-Irish people, mainly from India and the African continent. It has taken me some time to pronounce their names correctly; it’s a whole new experience and one that I am enjoying.


Some weeks ago I got chatting to a mother, who had a new-born baby with her. The child’s name was Sailor. I was tempted to ask her if the daddy was a sailor man.


I’m intrigued with how we get our names, and I’m especially interested in the socio-economic background to so many of our first names.


And then there are all those family names that are associated with trades, occupations and professions. 


Someone told me that before we were given surnames we were known by the type of work we did. It made for a great discussion around the dinner table this Christmas. No doubt the Woods were working with tress or in the forest, and the Thatchers made roofs with straw or reeds. Presumably the Taylors were in the rag trade.


In Newbridge in Co Kildare there is a railway bridge called Sex’s Bridge and I’m told there is a good story as to how it got its name.


Many railway and canal bridges were called after the designing architects or engineers.


Our names are important and how we address people is also important. In school fadó fadó we were called by our surnames. It was a horrible practice but complemented the treatment meted out to us. The first thing the Germans did to those arriving at the concentration camps was to strip them of their names and burn a number on their arms.


Nicknames can be good fun or insulting and greatly harming. Kate Winslet recalled in a Christmas interview how she was called Blubber in school and then later as an adult was known as Corset Kate.


I was introduced to a man called Karl last month. I asked him had he been called after Karl Marx, he said no, that he had been called after Pope John Paul II, Karol Wojtyla. I silently laughed to myself as I can only imagine the man today has little or no time for popes and none at all for JPII. I know another man with whom I worked is simply known at JP and he too is another baby of the John Paul II era. I wonder what Mr Varadkar thinks of Pope Leo calling himself after a former taoiseach?


Is it my imagination or is it that today first names are driven by our social background. In the past first names were handed down from one generation to the next; I’m called after my paternal grandfather. Maybe up until the 1970s and ’80s children were also called after saints.


But those traditions seem to have disappeared; today there are the neutral names, Old Testament names, celebrity names, TV names, and yes, even in the Republic of Ireland, the royal names.


I think if I had a child I’d give them a name which would make for a simple email address.


Happy New Year to all.

Featured Post

The short lived life of a publication that opened no doors

On August 8 the following appeared in Occasional Scribbles: " This blog has heard from a reliable source that the free-sheet, The Key, ...