Hopefully any suggestion that Cardinal Francis George has turned down a reception to the Irish meal in Chicago on March 16 has nothing to do with Irish policy not to have a residence ambassador in Rome to the Holy See.
Over the last 20 years the Catholic Church has stressed that there is no one corporate church that is universally responsible for what its priests do and don't do.
That's a dodge and if the absence of George is because of the Irish position, then the church seems to be contradicting its own position.
It seems there is appearing worldwide within elements of the church a rabid conservatism that is as worrying as any of the fundamentalist forms that show their ugly heads in other religions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured Post
What must Harry S Truman be thinking of Donald J Trump?
Isn’t ironic that on this day in 1948 US President Harry S Truman signed the Marshall Plan, handing out $5 billion worth of aid to 16 countr...
-
Benedict Gerard Hegarty was Fr Benedict Hegarty OP born in Passage West, Co Cork on February 13, 1937. He attended Christian Brothers Colleg...
-
John O’Rourke was born in Newry on November 14, 1939. He joined the Dominican Order in September 1958 and was ordained a priest in July 1965...
-
Below is the response from the United States Episcopal Church to President Donald Trump’s apology demand from the bishop on X. It's qui...
2 comments:
Michael, my comment refers to an older blog on the new English missal.
An American Dominican argues in a well researched article (see link below) that the new translation of the words of consecration, changing the old version '' bood of the new covenant shed for all'' to ''shed for many'' is not alone inaccurate, but also not in keeping with a central tenet of Christianity, according to which Christ died for the salvation do all.
I wonder is it heretical ?
All the best,
Barry Nyhan
http://www.americamagazine.org/content/article.cfm?article_id=12641
There seems never to be a problem with right wing heresy.
Post a Comment