Wednesday, October 8, 2025

Mansergh was the antithesis to social media echo chamber

This week’s column in The Kerryman newspaper.

Michael Commane

As a result of being in the doldrums in recent days I wasted far too much time scrolling on my phone and watching unbelievable rubbish, lies too. And is it addictive. 


I came across a video on YouTube of words purporting to be from Pope Leo about the death of Charlie Kirk. It just didn’t sound or feel like Pope Leo’s words. I checked the official Vatican website; not a sign of it. Pope Leo never said those words. Why are the social media companies allowed get away with it? 


The algorithms make it possible for the social media companies to feed you the material you want to see. That is beyond dangerous, worse than the old Wild West ever was.


On one clip I saw a man haranguing Micheál Martin on a public street. And because the Taoiseach would not engage with him he took off in a tantrum shouting nonsense.


It was only on reading the newspapers on Friday that I discovered Martin Mansergh had died. I was surprised to hear the news because I had only seen him a few weeks ago.


Regularly travelling by rail on the Cork Dublin service I would see Martin Mansergh reading a book or one of the many newspapers he had beside him. 


Living in Tipperary I presume he boarded the train either at Limerick Junction or Thurles. And it would appear he always travelled standard class. Indeed, the last time I saw him on the train he was asleep. On many occasions I was tempted to stop, say hello to him and compliment him on all the work he had done for the country. But I never did and now I regret it.


He was born in England. His background is Anglo Irish Protestant ascendancy and he traces his ancestry back to Cromwell.


He joined the Irish Civil Service as a young man  and later moved to politics at the behest of Charlie Haughey. He  was a Fianna Fáil TD for a number of years and also served as a minister of state. He played an important role in the confidential talks with Sinn Féin in the 1980s.


He was a highly intelligent man, who was respected and liked across the political divide. And one of the reasons for that was his ability to listen to people of different opinions. He was also a polite and gracious person.


Reading through the condolence book on RIP.ie it’s clear to see that he was a man who was always willing to listen to the opinions of others. He had time for other people and their views. I can see him there sitting in his seat on the train, reading or nodding off. I’m back thinking of the man who was so stupidly proud of haranguing Micheál Martin on the street that he featured it on his Facebook page.


To a casual onlooker like me, Martin Mansergh was the antithesis to everything social media is about. 


People on social media don’t listen to divergent viewpoints; they are too busy promoting their own causes, they are like echo chambers.


Ireland has lost a giant and unfortunately we are stuck with so many nasty peddlers on social media.

Tuesday, October 7, 2025

The Irish Constitution refers to the President as ‘he'

Below is a short extract from Article 12 of the Irish Constitution.

According to Article 12, 3.1 the President is a male person. Is our current election invalid, if not, why not? The pronoun ‘he’ is used right throughout Article 12 in Bunreacht na hÉireann.

ARTICLE 12

1 There shall be a President of Ireland (Uachtarán na hÉireann), hereinafter called the President, who shall take precedence over all other persons in the State and who shall exercise and perform the powers and functions conferred on the President by this Constitution and by law.

2     1° The President shall be elected by direct vote of the people.

2° Every citizen who has the right to vote at an election for members of Dáil Éireann shall have the right to vote at an election for President.

3° The voting shall be by secret ballot and on the system of proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote.

3     1° The President shall hold office for seven years from the date upon which he enters upon his office, unless before the expiration of that period he dies, or resigns, or is removed from office, or becomes permanently incapacitated, such incapacity being established to the satisfaction of the Supreme Court consisting of not less than five judges.

2° A person who holds, or who has held, office as President, shall be eligible for re-election to that office once, but only once.

3° An election for the office of President shall be held not later than, and not earlier than the sixtieth day before, the date of the expiration of the term of office of every President, but in the event of the removal from office of the President or of his death, resignation, or permanent incapacity established as aforesaid (whether occurring before or after he enters upon his office), an election for the office of President shall be held within sixty days after such event.

Monday, October 6, 2025

Presidential election highlights nonsense of Garda Vetting

There is much confusion surrounding the term ‘Garda Vetting’ as it is being used in the current presidential election campaign.

It seems Catherine Connolly’s employee had not received Garda Vetting certification; if so how was she able to work for Ms Connolly?

If the employee was not working with children or vulnerable persons, then was Garda Vetting required?

Is there a definition of ‘Vulnerable Persons’?

Garda Vetting and Security Clearance are different.

Any person who requires Garda Vetting for their employment may not begin in their job until they have received Garda Vetting certification.

The current controversy highlights many of the weaknesses of the current vetting system. The system in its current form is not fit for purpose.

From the website of the National Vetting Bureau

The National Vetting Bureau (Children and Vulnerable Persons) Acts 2012 to 2016 provide a statutory basis for the vetting of persons carrying out relevant work with children or vulnerable persons. The Act also creates offences and penalties for persons who fail to comply with its provisions.

The Act stipulates that a relevant organisation shall not permit any person to undertake relevant work or activities on behalf of the organisation, unless the organisation receives a vetting disclosure from the National Vetting Bureau in respect of that person. 

Garda vetting is conducted on behalf of registered organisations only and is not conducted for individual persons on a personal basis.

If you are seeking employment or intending to volunteer with an organisation which conducts relevant work, you may be asked to make an application to be vetted.

Saturday, October 4, 2025

First woman appointed Archbishop of Canterbury

Congratulations and God’s blessing to the newly appointed Archbishop of Canterbury Sarah Mullally.

Bishop Mullally's maiden name is Sarah Bowser. It means her husband must bring the Irish touch to her family. His name is Eamonn Mullally.

She comes to the job with a fine cv.

Friday, October 3, 2025

Germany celebrates thirty years of unification

Germany celebrates 30 years of unification today.

To mark the event German chancellor Friedrich Metz spoke at an event in Saarland. Also speaking in the State’s capital, Saabrücken was French president Emmanuel Macron, who spoke in German, acknowledging the strong friendship between Germany and France.

NY Sisters question Archbishop Dolan on Kirk statement

NY Catholic sisters challenge Cardinal Dolan's praise for Charlie Kirk

Source: Global Sisters Report
https://share.google/mWPmqT8PG7Y4sgHT2

Thursday, October 2, 2025

Catherine Connolly’s 1930s’ parallels is beyond absurd

Presidential candidate Catherine Connolly’s comments about Germany’s current military spending having "some parallels with the ’30s" is outrageous, indeed despicable.

Yes, there has been a seismic change in German defence policy and the Düsseldorf armaments company Rheinmetall’s shares have jumped 17 times since the outbreak of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

It is a cruel reality that war makes money for wealthy and powerful people.

But to attempt to make the slightest comparison between Germany’s current expenditure on weapons with what the Hitler government did is absurd, dishonest, cheap too.

The Germany of the 1930s built weapons to attack; it committed unspeakable crimes.

The current German government is supplying arms to Ukraine in order to repel the Russian invader.

Yes, it is a highly emotive topic; these days are the anniversary of what happened at Babi Yar, where  Ukrainians supported the Germans in murdering people of the Jewish faith.

It is supreme irony that German tanks are rolling again in Ukraine but this time in defence of the people.

History is never easy. For Catherine Connolly to make any reference hinting at parallels  between Germany’s invasion of Ukraine in World War II and how the Federal Republic of Germany is now supporting, in a limited way, Ukraine in its fight against Russia crosses a red line.

Words matter.

Since the creation of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1949 no country has done more to support countries in need. 

To make the slightest comparison between the current German government and the German government of the 1930s is abominable.

If Catherine Connolly wants to point any fingers at Germany, she might well point a finger at the AfD and how it has "some parallels with the ’30s”.

Wednesday, October 1, 2025

Technology is causing us to lose the run of ourselves

This week’s column in The Kerryman newspaper.

Michael Commane

Over the last few weeks there has been talk in the media about the misbehaviour of people in public.


A woman in her mid-80s described on RTE’s Liveline how on a crowded bus no one stood up to offer her a seat. Though dare I, from my own experience, comment that I often see older people behaving in an aggressive and entitled manner.


Some weeks ago journalist Justine McCarthy wrote in her weekly column in The Irish Times on how as a nation being rude is the latest trend in town. She argued that because of automation there is less need for us to engage with one another in our daily lives. How right she is.


When I first saw a self-service checkout in a supermarket I was surprised. Guess what, these days when buying my groceries I head automatically to the self-service checkout. And really that’s something of a contradiction for me. 


Automation means we have no verbal interaction with anyone in the shop and today most self-service checkouts don’t accept cash, which means we don’t get to feel, see or touch the money that pays for our purchase.


Most businesses now use automatic telephone answering; it’s even used by pharmacies and GPs. 


Again, no real human interaction. And if we have the patience to wait on the phone, three, four, maybe even 10 minutes to speak to a human voice, we are at that stage irritated and frustrated, so it is easy for us to launch into an attack on the unfortunate person with whom we eventually speak.


Last week I called Luas to report a school bag I found at a tram stop. After three attempts and zillions of automated replies I managed to speak to a human voice, but it was not Luas, it was Transport for Ireland.


I discovered in order to get through to any transport company, your call is directed firstly to Transport for Ireland. What nonsense.


It seems it’s not economical for us to talk to real people when we want to engage with most services today. That means we are losing the naturalness and spontaneity in ordinary, everyday conversation.


We are now using phones from dawn to dusk. And that really struck me last week when I saw an adult, presumably a parent, with two young children, talking on the phone and not a word between them and their children.


One day cycling on a busy street in Dublin, half in jest, half seriously, I rang my bell at a man who was walking across the street looking in the other direction. As soon as he saw me he shouted: ‘F-off’.


Last Thursday evening RTE’s Prime Time reported on the dramatic increase in antisocial behaviour across the country. We saw shocking incidences of vandalism. There was a call for more gardaí on our streets, experts were tracing the increasing bad behaviour back to the Covid crisis.

Might it be that because of our great strides in technology we are losing some of the most important characteristics of what it means to be human?


It seems we are constantly on the edge of being frustrated, which can easily lead us to lashing out.


Meanwhile, here is simply no excuse for such hostility and rudeness as displayed at the Ryder Cup in New York last weekend.


Speak to people with a kind word.

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

It seems Pope Leo never said these words

The link: https://youtu.be/IulIY6CIVRE?si=wyXjt9apCgABePJM is available on YouTube.  But there appears to be no mention of it on the Vatican website and the words and sentiment don’t seem to fit  with the views  and style of Pope Leo.

It is a comment on the death of Charlie Kirk purported to be the words of Pope Leo.

We live in extremely worrying times.

Dimitri Shostakovich

Dimitri Shostakovich, Piano Concerto No 2

https://youtu.be/1DFqVqApms8?si=8cG4tlJgn1QS_d2n

Take a moment out and listen to this; it never fails.

Shostakovich fell out of favour with Stalin. Some days after Stalin had attended a Shostakovich  concert in Moscow, from

Dimitri Shostakovich
which he walked out, Shostakovich was told to report to a state official. He was left waiting two/three hours when someone asked him why was he waiting. Shostakovich told him he was told to report to see a commissar. The passing man told him to go home as the commissar had earlier been executed on the orders of Stalin. Shostakovich’s life had been spared.

The composer wrote the famous music played at the Siege of Leningradit is his Symphony No. 7, also known as the "Leningrad Symphony". This powerful piece was dedicated to the city of Leningrad and its people's endurance during the long and brutal German siege of the city during World War II.  

Dimitri Shostakovich died on August 9, 1975 

Monday, September 29, 2025

Free visits to the zoo come with elephant-style baggage

Half listening to the radio or reading an item in the print media I thought I read that old age pensioners were now able to visit the zoo free of charge.

But when you read the small print it’s not at all as simple as that.

Firstly, it only applies from September 26 to October 3 during Positive Ageing Week. But there are many other hoops one has to jump, that is if one can still jump.

In anyone’s language it comes close to a respectable scam. Or maybe it is the conditions below are confusing.


The so-called free entry is valid for visitors aged 65 and over, provided they purchase a full-price adult or child ticket at the gate. How to claim free entry:

  1. Confirm the dates: The offer is valid from Friday, September 26, to Friday, October 3, 2025. 
  2. Purchase a full-price ticket: You must buy a full-price adult or child ticket at the gate. 
  3. Show your identification: Present your ID to verify your age (65+) when purchasing your ticket at the gate. 
  4. Visit the Zoo: Enjoy your free visit to Dublin Zoo. 

Sunday, September 28, 2025

Newspaper article on synodality has little to say

Is much of the talk about synodality pie-in-sky? Has the word to be used by every high-ranking cleric to prove he’s watching his career?

A recent Catholic newspaper gave three pages to synodality. The three pages could easily have been synopsised in  some few short sentences.

The article included a picture of a number of people, including Cardinal Mario Grech, secretary general of the synod of bishops, who was in Ireland last week. The picture named only one person in the caption and that was Cardinal Grech. A former editor of The Star newspaper, Ger Colleran would never allow a picture to appear in a newspaper without all names mentioned.

It’s always the small things that give us away; that caption told its own story of how real synodality means to so many people in the church. Something else, right through the three pages, the word church was consistently spelt with an upper case C, how synodal is that?

Reading the article one was forced to ask what relevance it had to anyone who has lost interest in the Catholic Church, those who have been hurt and alienated by its priests and functionaries.


Saturday, September 27, 2025

IDF snipers are blind to the humanity of their victims

To my shame I have come late to reading Mark O’Connell. The piece below is his column in The Irish Times ofSaturday, September 20.

Reading it one is forced to say, yes, of course, how correct these words are. The column brings the reader directly into her/his own soul and how we should react when we directly see the face on another person.


Mark O'Connell

There’s a moment at about the mid-point of Tolstoy’s War and Peace, where Nikolai Rostov – a young and avidly patriotic aristocrat, serving as a hussar in Tsar Alexander’s army during the Napoleonic wars – advances bravely against a French officer in the chaos of battle.

Taken unawares by the horse-mounted charge, the Frenchman is flung from his own horse, and is left fatally vulnerable to Rostov’s sword. Rostov pauses a moment before moving to kill the enemy soldier, and in that moment something changes: the thrill of battle suddenly drains away, and with it any sense of moral legitimacy to the act he is about to commit.

“He was terrified,” writes Tolstoy of the fallen French soldier, “wincing from immediate expectation of another blow, and he looked up at Rostov, recoiling in horror. This pale, mud-stained face of a fair-haired young man with a dimple on his chin and bright blue eyes had no business with battlefields; it was not the face of an enemy; it was a domestic, indoor face.”

Rather than being killed, the Frenchman is taken as a prisoner of war by Rostov’s regiment. Rostov himself, despite being awarded a medal for his supposed bravery in battle, is gripped by a deep and somewhat mysterious shame. He had glimpsed this young Frenchman’s terrified face – his domestic, indoor face, with its bright blue eyes and its dimpled chin – and had come within a heartbeat of killing him.

Face-to-face encounter

Had he not been so close to him, had he slashed him with his sword from behind, the Frenchman would have remained “the enemy”, and he would have killed him, because it is easier to kill an abstraction than a man.

It was the face-to-face encounter that saved the Frenchman, and that prevented Rostov from killing him.

This moment, at the heart of Tolstoy’s sprawling and morally questioning work of fiction, is one that I have found myself thinking about a lot recently.

Obviously, warfare has changed a great deal since the Napoleonic wars of the early 19th century, and since Tolstoy wrote about their effect on Russian aristocratic society some 50 years later.

There are no more horse-mounted regiments, and no more swords, just as there are no more Russian aristocrats.

Increasingly, the business of killing is carried out at a technological remove, a distance that permits radical extremes of abstraction. The AI kill-chain algorithm does not see a pale, mud-stained face; it sees only a target.

A contemporary Nikolai Rostov would not be charging into battle on his horse; he would likely be sitting in a windowless room in a hardened control station somewhere in occupied Donetsk, operating a strike drone as it hovers over a Ukrainian army position.

But just as there was a great deal of killing from a distance during the Napoleonic wars (the battle scenes in War and Peace are thick with the smoke of cannon fire), there remain many situations in contemporary warfare in which the enemy must be encountered head-on.

The sniper, for instance, kills from a distance, but in such a way as he must glimpse the face of his target, and must surely risk glimpsing their humanity.

Last week saw the publication of a five-month investigative report by a number of media outlets – among them The Guardian, Der Spiegel, and Arab Reporters for Investigative Journalism – detailing the killing by Israel Defense Forces (IDF) snipers of four members of a Palestinian family in a single day in November 2023. An article in the Guardian names two of the snipers.

‘My first elimination’

The article details a recording of one, an American, watching footage of the killings, and speaking to an undercover journalist.

“That was my first elimination,” he says, referring to the death of the Palestinian teenager Salem Doghmosh, whom he shot while he was trying to retrieve a body. “It’s hard for me to understand why he [did that]”, the sniper says, “and also it doesn’t really interest me. I mean, what was so important about that corpse?”

What was so important about that corpse was that it was the body of his older brother, Mohammed.

According to the Guardian report, the sniper acknowledges that his 19-year old victim was unarmed.

He says: “They’re thinking: ‘Oh I don’t think I’ll get shot because I’m wearing civilian clothes and I am not carrying a weapon and all that, but they were wrong. That’s what you have snipers for.”

After Salem was shot to death, his 51-year-old father, Montasser Doghmosh, attempted to retrieve the bodies of his two sons. In the recording, as he approaches the bodies of his dead sons, he is heard to repeat the words “My boys, my boys.” He too, is fatally shot by IDF snipers.

Evidence of war crimes

International law explicitly prohibits attacking unarmed people, and people who are retrieving bodies.

The footage of these killings, and the soldier’s recorded account of them, appear to be evidence of war crimes. Almost as much as his actions, the soldier’s language demonstrates the extent to which he is blinded to the humanity of the people he killed.

In War and Peace, the intractable shame experienced by Nikolai Rostov in the wake of his encounter with the unhorsed French officer has, partly, to do with his sense of his failure to live up to the requirements of the battlefield. He feels shame both because he has come so close to killing the other man, and because he is rendered morally incapable of doing so by the recognition, in the glimpse of his “domestic” face, of his humanity.

His own humanity is at odds with the ideal of the warrior.

He cannot kill the Frenchman, because he has seen his face, and recognised in it the life of a fellow human. The Lithuanian-French philosopher Emmanuel Levinas, who served in the French army during the second World War – and who, as a Jew, avoided the extermination camps as a captured prisoner of war – located the face-to-face encounter between humans as the foundation of ethics.

For Levinas, the face of another human being, in its nakedness and vulnerability, embodies the primary and foundational command of human relations and of morality: thou shalt not kill.

I am not saying here that the American soldier and his fellow IDF snipers would not have killed that Palestinian family if they had seen their faces. What I am saying is that these men had so thoroughly and radically dehumanised their victims that their faces would, on some crucial level, have registered to them only as those of “the enemy”.

And here can be glimpsed a horrible irony at the heart of genocide: it is in the very process of dehumanising their victims that the perpetrators destroy what is left of their own humanity.

Friday, September 26, 2025

Soviet hero who saved the world in 1983

 On this day, September 26, 1983 Soviet Air Force officer Stanislav Petrov identified a report of an incoming nuclear missile as a computer error and not an American first strike, thus preventing a nuclear war.

What if that happened today and there were no Stanislav Petrov in the room?

Thursday, September 25, 2025

Pope Leo invites men of different views to his table

The link below is well worth a read. It’s from the National Catholic Reporter.

Pope Leo held private audiences with two figures emblematic of opposing poles within US Catholicism: Cardinal Raymond Burke, a prominent Francis critic who denounced synodality as a threat to the integrity of the church, and Jesuit priest James Martin, an advocate for LGBTQ+ inclusion in the church whose ministry with LGBTQ+ outreach received repeated signs of support from Francis. 

Pope Leo's interview with a Vatican journalist provides insight into how he sees his role as pope: a bridge-builder, engaging but uncontroversial, and acting as an astute administrator.

 https://www.ncronline.org/node/311641

Wednesday, September 24, 2025

Former Dominican priest Brian Horgan dies

Former Dominican priest,

Brian Horgan, far right, 1965/‘66
Brian Horgan died in Tallaght University Hospital this morning.

Brian was ordained a priest in 1972. He resigned from priesthood some few short years after ordination and spent his working life as a probation officer, and played a leading role in the trade union movement.

His brother Denys, was also a Dominican priest, he too resigned from priesthood and is now living in the US.

Brian was born in Dublin in July 1947. 

May Brian rest in peace. 

Featured Post

Mansergh was the antithesis to social media echo chamber

This week’s column in The Kerryman newspaper. Michael Commane As a result of being in the doldrums in recent days I wasted far too much time...